4 ms·
> It doesn't have a "browser", it has a testing shell. So, yes it is still pre-historic. > Once it gets embedding stabilized that will be the time for a full
by rvz 9mo ago
> It doesn't have a "browser", it has a testing shell.
So, yes it is still pre-historic.
> Once it gets embedding stabilized that will be the time for a full blown browser developement.
Servo development began in 2012. [0] 14 years later we get a v0.0.1.
At this point, Ladybird will likely reach 1.0 faster than Servo could, and the latter is not even remotely close to being usable even in 14 years of waiting.
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Servo_(software) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Servo_(software)
- tvshtr 9mo agoThis is disingenuous. Servo is using RUST, language which grew together with it, pretty much, and all components surrounding it. C++ is how old, please remind me?
- Dylan16807 9mo agoYou could make almost any non-C non-C++ project good by that metric. And no, they're not being disingenuous.
- echelon 9mo ago> At this point, Ladybird will likely reach 1.0 faster than Servo could, and the latter is not even remotely close to being usable even in 14 years of waiting. When Servo is done, it's going to be a beast. It's getting hundreds of commits per week: https://github.com/servo/servo/graphs/commit-activity https://github.com/servo/servo/graphs/commit-activity
- snerbles 9mo agoIt's by no means accurate, but the comparative histories of Ladybird vs. Servo sure has some parallels with Linux vs. GNU Hurd.