3 ms·

What are you talking about? It doesn't have a "browser", it has a testing shell. For a time there was actual attempt with the Verso experiment but it got shelv

• rvz 8mo ago
  > It doesn't have a "browser", it has a testing shell. So, yes it is still pre-historic. > Once it gets embedding stabilized that will be the time for a full blown browser developement. Servo development began in 2012. [0] 14 years later we get a v0.0.1. At this point, Ladybird will likely reach 1.0 faster than Servo could, and the latter is not even remotely close to being usable even in 14 years of waiting. [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Servo_(software) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Servo_(software)
  • tvshtr 8mo ago
    This is disingenuous. Servo is using RUST, language which grew together with it, pretty much, and all components surrounding it. C++ is how old, please remind me?
    • Dylan16807 8mo ago
      You could make almost any non-C non-C++ project good by that metric. And no, they're not being disingenuous.
  • echelon 8mo ago
    > At this point, Ladybird will likely reach 1.0 faster than Servo could, and the latter is not even remotely close to being usable even in 14 years of waiting. When Servo is done, it's going to be a beast. It's getting hundreds of commits per week: https://github.com/servo/servo/graphs/commit-activity https://github.com/servo/servo/graphs/commit-activity
  • snerbles 8mo ago
    It's by no means accurate, but the comparative histories of Ladybird vs. Servo sure has some parallels with Linux vs. GNU Hurd.