> Particularly egregious is that they then elect to resolve this difference in opinion by appeal to human masters, who are hundreds of elo weaker than Stockfish

> Particularly egregious is that they then elect to resolve this difference in opinion by appeal to human masters, who are hundreds of elo weaker than Stockfish! What a petty complaint. A human expert analyzing a move, with access to stockfish and every other chess program they want, can be a very good analyst.