4 ms·
38, I played 2, but it was pretty bad compared to Warcraft III. Three still holds up just as well as it did back then.
by Aeolun 8mo ago
38, I played 2, but it was pretty bad compared to Warcraft III. Three still holds up just as well as it did back then.
- croon 8mo agoNot to be a patronizing old fart, but may I assume that you played II after III? If so I can understand it, but II was very special when it came out, and I never revisited it after. I think it's a case of being better when it came out than another thing was when it came out, despite the other thing being comparatively better without the context of its time.
- kemotep 8mo ago2 is a much harder game in my opinion. I don’t think even at the hardest difficulty level Warcraft 3 has any levels that require you to do a contested marine landing and then build a base before immediately being attacked again. The final Orc mission took me forever to beat. And the expansion? Good lord.
- cogman10 8mo agoIMO, Starcraft 1 is better than both 2 and 3. III has a better and more interesting story telling. But gameplay wise I really like the starcraft 1 system without the heros. I think warcraft 3 adds too much complexity and gimmickry that takes away from fun RTS gameplay. That said, Warcraft 3 mods were the shit. There were so many fun and inventive modes of play that you could just barely do with starcraft and not at all with warcraft.
- OoooooooO 8mo agoWarcraft 3 custom map mod was the birth of Defense of the Ancients Allstars which then became its own game by Valve as Dota 2 (and Blizzard was pissed and tried legal stuff to reclaim) which now became Deadlock = Dota 3. It's been a while ...