3 ms·
Rather than linking to a threads post that is a screenshot of the x.com post with little to no commentary, we should be linking to the original x.com post http
by igneo676 8mo ago
Rather than linking to a threads post that is a screenshot of the x.com post with little to no commentary, we should be linking to the original x.com post
https://x.com/rauchg/status/2020984434338693622 https://x.com/rauchg/status/2020984434338693622
- bstsb 8mo agoor to a nitter instance, where you can actually read responses without signing in: https://xcancel.com/rauchg/status/2020984434338693622 https://xcancel.com/rauchg/status/2020984434338693622 or https://nitter.net/rauchg/status/2020984434338693622 https://nitter.net/rauchg/status/2020984434338693622
- crote 8mo agoConsidering that Twitter doesn't show the original post for non-logged-in users, the screenshot on Threads actually provides a better reading experience for most people!
- theultdev 8mo agoYou're missing a large part of the conversation and context if you don't at least link to the source.
- opello 8mo agoIt seems like sometimes it does and sometimes it doesn't, and I can only imagine popularity is somehow the reason.
- guywithahat 8mo agoOnly if you already have a threads account. On mobile it makes you sign in
- theultdev 8mo agoAgreed, was slow to load and I just had to find the source post on X to view the real conversation "thread". This is the first Threads link I've ever seen here. Is that what Threads mainly is, reposting X screenshots and starting a sidechain conversation?
- xyst 8mo agofor fucks sakes, don’t link twitter Use nitter or xcancel