4 ms·
Not quite everywhere. There's a common denominator for all of those: Microsoft. Their business is buying good products and turning them into shit, while wringi
by amarant 8mo ago
Not quite everywhere. There's a common denominator for all of those: Microsoft.
Their business is buying good products and turning them into shit, while wringing every cent they can out of the business. Always has been.
They have a grace period of about 2-4 years after acquisition where interference is minimal. Then it ramps up. How long a product can survive once the interference begins largely depends on how good senior leadership at that product company is at resisting the interference. It's a hopeless battle, the best you can do is to lose slowly.
- Andrex 8mo agoThings don't always ramp up after 2-4 years. Sometimes MS just kills the project or company after that period of time. See also their moves in the gaming industry.
- amarant 8mo agoHeh, I was working at 2 of those gaming companies when they were acquired by m$. I almost fear taking another job in the gaming industry, there seems to be some kind of bastardised version of Murphy's law that any gaming company that hires me will be acquired by ms 6 months later. I mean, that's obviously not the case, but it's weird that it happened twice!
- Andrex 8mo agoVery weird it happened twice! But that's a kind of a cool factoid to tell people haha. Even with devs and publishers that don't die or are killed, they still lay hundreds off when a game is done. Then the studio limps along in pre-production mode on their next game for 4-5 years it seems like... Maybe the only job stability in the industry is with indies, and... Nintendo?
- amarant 8mo agoI'd add the hugely successful studios to that list. Even after ms acquisition, to the best of my knowledge neither of the 2 studios I worked at had any layoffs. But they boast the most sold video game in the history of videogames (Tetris a close-ish second), and most downloaded free mobile game, respectively. Each have player bases larger than the population of the country they're from! Here's to hoping ms is hesitant to gut either!
- deleted 8mo ago[deleted]
- close04 8mo ago> But they boast the most sold video game in the history of videogames (Tetris a close-ish second), and most downloaded free mobile game, respectively. Just out of curiosity, I guessed Minecraft which tracks, and Subway Surfers respectively, rather than Candy Crush Saga. Is CCS actually the most downloaded free mobile game ever?
- disgruntledphd2 8mo agoCall of Duty and Candy Crush I would say (if you count Farm Heroes as CCS because it's just a reskin for APAC then it's probably not even close).
- amarant 8mo agoCommon misconception that. I also thought the hardcore gamer games would be in the top. They're not even close. Minecraft has sold 350 million copies. Call of duty: black ops a measly 43 million. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_best-selling_video_games https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_best-selling_video_gam...
- disgruntledphd2 8mo agoI would have said that the OP meant the Call of Duty series in general, rather than a specific instance. Given the mobile thing mentioned also, it's most likely to be Activison (which has been acquired by Microsoft).
- amarant 8mo agoHmm... My source here is internal king communications, they were very proud of it. But I left there years ago, so I guess it might've changed? Pretty sure it was the biggest at the time at least.
- its_magic 8mo agoI for one am shocked--SHOCKED, I say!--to learn that anything bad could happen as a result of a) putting everything in "the cloud" and b) handing control over the entire world's source code to the likes of Microsoft. Who could have POSSIBLY foreseen any kind of dire consequences?
- endgame 8mo agoNobody. Nobody at all could have seen it. Microsoft is cool now, haven't you seen VSCode? They do Open Source, they run Linux, they've joined the fold, the tiger shed its stripes.
- tosti 8mo agoMore like a wolf in sheep clothing
- danny_codes 8mo agoIronically they are enshitifying vscode too. Even products them make themselves can’t survive long.
- whstl 8mo agoYou're obviously being sarcastic, but for the longest time the dominant position of a huge chunk of HN (and the tech world in general) has been that the cloud is the answer to any problem, and that anything deviating from it is either impossible, too expensive or too stupid. After a generation of indoctrinated people, Microsoft (or any FAANG really) can't even afford to do anything differently.
- its_magic 8mo agoFor this entire time, my position has been that the people trying to put everything in the cloud were idiots who would come to regret this. Thus explaining my sarcasm. It's time to fire back with both barrels at the dumbasses who rolled their eyes and said I was stupid, wrong, had no idea what I was talking about, blah blah blah. (Same shit they always say about every word that comes out of my mouth. So tiring.) Laughs in Linux
- vbezhenar 8mo agoI remember how crazy Skype originally was. At my first company we used Skype to communicate with each other. Mostly chats and files. One day our internet cable to the office got cut by someone. Well, we didn't realize that for some time, because Skype just continued to work without Internet. It was like a miracle. It was unique software, there's nothing like it even today. I think that the first thing Microsoft did after they bought Skype is making Internet mandatory, probably to spy on all chats.