3 ms·
What's the purpose of using an LLM to write a comment here?
by bonsai_spool 9mo ago
What's the purpose of using an LLM to write a comment here?
- ssl-3 9mo ago"Hey, someone on the Internet used decent diction! Obviously, this means I must accuse them of being a bot!" (Hey Dang. Can we get a ban button? There's a few people here that are impossible to conduct rational discourse with. My sanity would improve if they were simply gone from my view.)
- ninalanyon 9mo agoYou could create a browser user script to do it locally.
- ssl-3 9mo agoThat's not a terrible idea. An extra UI element or two should be enough. Maybe with sticky options for collapse-by-default or hide-by-default at the top of each HN comment section. And the list of usernames can be stored and edited in the purveyor's HN bio (in plain text, like a monster), so that it works automatically across devices.
- bonsai_spool 9mo agoYou've edited the response since you posted it. I think there's a difference between diction and the standard output of ChatGPT et al.
- ssl-3 9mo ago[dead]
- antx 9mo agoAnd we're also here to use double dashes, aren't we.
- ssl-3 8mo agoYes, if we fucking choose to do that. We are.
- vo2maxer 8mo agoYes! The reflexive “must be LLM generated” is becoming ridiculous. Anything that includes proper punctuation and, god forbid, em dashes which I’ve used all my life must be suspect. The “it’s not x, it’s y” construction predates LLMs. I don’t recall ever sending a text without making sure it contained no errors, and yes, many have included infrequently used vocabulary.
- ssl-3 8mo agoI know, right? I've been trying to write properly, clearly, and with the most expressive words I can come up with for many decades. I try to punctuate well, and to use functional formatting that I hope helps to effectively convey whatever it is that I'm on about. I try to improve as time goes on. And I do this because if I'm going to bother with writing something for others to read, then I want my intended meaning to be easily-understood. But increasingly, the instances where I manage to not screw any of that up too terribly result in a snarky and insulting retort in return. And that kind of response is just not useful to anyone. I mean: What would people presume to have me do, instead? Become less-literate? Die in a fire? (Worse?) fuh.
- vo2maxer 8mo agoIt’s frustrating to the point that I have considered inserting grammatical errors, but that would go against my principles, which I have attempted to inculcate in my children. Yes, a significant amount of what’s posted is copied and pasted AI slop. But what in the world preceded this? Barely legible slop? I would much rather have someone craft their thoughts, run them through their preferred model, and write something coherent that is not marred by punctuation or basic elementary grammar errors. And you know what, the hell with the AI slop police. Yes, if we choose to use em dashes, we will.
- rfl890 9mo agoI have trouble believing that you're pointing this out in good faith.
- _Microft 8mo agoThere is an extension called HN Friends that allows to add information to a tooltip for users and shows a hint that there exists such information. Use this as you like.
- deleted 8mo ago[deleted]
- Dachande663 9mo agoUpvoted because this stinks to high hell of an LLM response. Half the GPs comments seem to be in a similar vein. It’s such a shame but you can’t fight the trolls so don’t take it to heart.
- rjh29 8mo agoYour LLM detector is broken.
- sehansen 8mo agoI've just skimmed through the first handful of pages with ssl-3's comments and none of them seem particularly LLM-like.
- abustamam 8mo agoWhether or not they did use an LLM to refine, what does it matter? To call them a troll for contributing to discourse is wild.
- deleted 8mo ago[deleted]