I'm unconvinced, to my possibly-undercaffeinated mind, the string of 3 posts reads like this: - a problem already solved in TFA (you vouching for someone event

I'm unconvinced, to my possibly-undercaffeinated mind, the string of 3 posts reads like this: - a problem already solved in TFA (you vouching for someone eventually denounced doesn't prevent you from being denounced, you can totally do it) - a per-repo, or worse, global, blockchain to solve incrementing and decrementing integers (vouch vs. denounce) - a lack of understanding that automated global scoring systems are an abuse vector and something people will avoid. (c.f. Black Mirror and social credit scores in China)