5 ms·
OpenAI Frontier
- turbocon 8mo agoOpenClawd for the business is here. Wow that was fast.
- baxtr 8mo agoVibe coded?
- paradite 8mo agoOkay now this is gonna trigger mass layoffs, if it works.
- bilekas 8mo agoMisguided mass layoffs though so nothing new.
- thepasch 8mo agoIt's not going to "trigger" mass layoffs; it'll be used as a convenient scapegoat for mass layoffs that were always going to happen anyway to make room for more stock buybacks. Business as usual. Same shit, different hat.
- falloutx 8mo agoif only companies like openAI can put this much effort into actually curing Cancer.
- andsoitis 8mo ago> if only companies like openAI can put this much effort into actually curing Cancer https://openai.com/index/color-health/ https://openai.com/index/color-health/
- falloutx 8mo agoLets be honest color is not solving cancer when they make money from managing cancer. you just searched openai cancer and gave me back the first result.
- ninja3925 8mo ago[flagged]
- yanis_t 8mo ago[flagged]
- turnsout 8mo agoAs someone who would be in a position to advise enterprises on whether to adopt Frontier, there is simply not enough information for me to follow the "Contact Sales" CTA. We need technical details, example workflows, case studies, social proof and documentation. Especially when it's so trivial to roll your own agent.
- vessenes 8mo agoI’m imagining this is like ai native slack. Which would be a super useful thing. But I’m with you, who knows? I had a ceo sign up - I’m curious to see one of my companies try it out.
- WarmWash 8mo agoLooks like 2026 is indeed shaping up to be the year of the agent.
- jaredcwhite 8mo agoHilarious! Year of the Agent, hahahaha. Good one!
- sdf2erf 8mo ago"Year of X" is so cringe. They said it was all about Agents last year... yawn. Wake me up when they have something to show that makes people go "wow this is amazing" and has real economic consequences.
- bilekas 8mo ago> The way work gets done has changed, and enterprises are starting to feel it in big ways. Why do they say all of this fluff when everyone knows it’s not exactly true yet. Just makes me be cynical of the rest. When can we say we have enough AI? Even for enterprise? I would guess that for the majority of power users you could stop now and people would be generally okay with it, maybe some further into medical research or things that are actually important. For Sam Altman and microslop though it seems to be a numbers game, just have everyone in and own everything. It’s not even about AGI anymore I feel.
- Waterluvian 8mo ago> when everyone knows it’s not exactly true yet I think two things: 1. Not everyone knows. 2. As we've seen at a national scale: if you just lie lie lie enough it starts being treated like the truth.
- dbshapco 8mo agoI'm agnostic, but ... "And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie: That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness." For a more modern take, paraphrasing Hannah Arendt. “The ideal subject of totalitarian rule is not the convinced Nazi or the convinced Communist, but people for whom the distinction between fact and fiction, true and false, no longer exists.” We live in a an age where for many media is reality, uncritical, unchecked. Press releases are about creating reality, not reporting it, they are about psychological manipulation, not information. > As we've seen at a national scale: if you just lie lie lie enough it starts being treated like the truth. This actually happened in reverse with the spread of social media dynamics to politics and major media. Twitter made Trump president, not the other way around. * No LLMs were harmed in the making of this comment.
- baxtr 8mo agoIs there any reason not to assume that the article was created by an LLM?
- Insanity 8mo agoBuilding on OpenAI as a long term business strategy is dubious. Better go with an established cloud player for these solutions imo. OpenAI might burn through all their money, and end up dropping support for these features and/or being sold off for parts altogether.
- ecshafer 8mo agoI doubt that there is any risk at all. One is that this is probably a minor aspect of the business seeing these AIs. AIs that ive seen deployed so far for real work seem to best be done in side business offerings that you can tolerate a high false positive / false negative rate, but also isnt price sensitive enough that building a fully done automated pipeline classically is worth it or possible.
- WarmWash 8mo agoThere is a reason Apple chose gemini for apple intelligence, despite Google being in many ways a foe, and OpenAI and Anthropic both having way more "Apple flavor" to them.
- Insanity 8mo agoExactly. OpenAI is riding out a first mover advantage, but they have no moat. Plus a company like Google can bundle Gemini with other corporate offerings like Drive and Google Docs etc. I just don’t see OpenAI winning this in the long run. And I’m saying that while I am subscribed to ChatGPT lol.
- estsauver 8mo agoI have a hard time believing that the right move for most organizations that aren't already bought into an OpenAI enterprise plan is going to be building their entire business around something like this. This ties you to one model provider that has been having issues keeping up with the other big labs and provides what looks like superficially some extremely useful tools but with unclear amounts of rigor. I don't think I would want to build my business on this if I was an AI-native company that was just starting right now unless they figure out how to make this much more legible and transparent to people.
- chairhairair 8mo agoUpside: your employees don’t have to use WorkDay. Downside: your employees’ agents decide that they should collectively bargain.
- Oras 8mo agoWeird that it doesn't support MS Office, unless this would affect OpenAI <=> MS partnership.
- moralestapia 8mo agoWhat's MS Office?
- xena 8mo agoAh, right, GP meant Microsoft Copilot 365 Enterprise Edition (with Copilot).
- moralestapia 8mo agoBeautiful!
- deleted 8mo ago[deleted]
- anematode 8mo agoNever heard of it.
- 1899-12-30 8mo agoM$ already has a program like this doesn't it? Microsoft™ 365™ Copilot™ agents™ Weird amounts of overlap between the two.
- j16sdiz 8mo agoplacing State Farm's testimonial first really tell you something
- andsoitis 8mo agoThere are many ways to interpret it. What’s your interpretation? It is also interesting to contrast calling them by name vs. the other example, “a major semiconductor company”, not called by name. Though of course, there are also different reasonable ways to interpret that.
- an0malous 8mo agoGreat, some more bullshit our founders are going to force onto the company while they never use it, ignore everyone’s feedback that it doesn’t work, and expect everything to be done twice as fast now
- miltonlost 8mo agoLove all these anecdotes and magic stats that they don't have citations for and we're just supposed to believe.
- Sol- 8mo agoIs it their version of virtual AI employees that some startups were previously getting into, plus on-site support by FDEs and such?
- bix6 8mo ago> “Partnering with OpenAI helps us give thousands of State Farm agents and employees better tools to serve our customers. By pairing OpenAI’s Frontier platform and deployment expertise with our people, we’re accelerating our AI capabilities and finding new ways to help millions plan ahead, protect what matters most, and recover faster when the unexpected happens.” — Joe Park, Executive Vice President and Chief Digital Information Officer at State Farm Ok how about you tell us one thing this shit is actually doing instead of vague nonsense.
- franktankbank 8mo agoI'm sorry do you have some problem with protecting things that matter most?
- deleted 8mo ago[deleted]
- Aeroi 8mo agoproducts and features are starting to get spread thin...
- chain030 8mo agoThe failure risk of OAI is rising.
- mhitza 8mo ago> This is happening for AI leaders across every industry, and the pressure to catch up is increasing. > Enterprises are feeling the pressure to figure this out now, because the gap between early leaders and everyone else is growing fast. > The question now isn’t whether AI will change how work gets done, but how quickly your organization can turn agents into a real advantage. FOMO at its finnest. "Quick before you're left behind for good this time!" The idea itself has sensibility. It is the kind of AI application I've been pitching to companies, though without going all in on agents. Though I think it would be foollish for any CEO to build this on top of OpenAi, instead of a self-hosted model, and also train the model for them. You're just externalizing your internal knowledge this way.
- anzerarkin 8mo agoWell, even working as an AI engineer is no longer secure. It may soon be the case that all humans work for bots created by others. Is that the universal salary we are talking about?
- deleted 8mo ago[deleted]
- andsoitis 8mo ago“Never send a human to do a machine’s job.” — Agent Smith, The Matrix
- ossa-ma 8mo ago> "75% of enterprise workers say AI helped them do tasks they couldn’t do before." > "At OpenAI alone, something new ships roughly every three days, and that pace is getting faster." - We're seeing all these productivity improvements and it seems as though devs/"workers" are being forced to output so much more, are they now being paid proportionally for this output? Enterprise workers now have to move at the pace of their agents and manage essentially 3-4 workers at all times (we've seen this in dev work). Where are the salary bumps to reflect this? - Why do AI companies struggle to make their products visually distinct OpenAI Frontier looks the exact same as OpenAI Codex App which looks the exact same as GPT - OpenAI going for the agent management market share (Dust, n8n, crewai)
- simonw 8mo agoI imagine the salary bumps occur when the individuals who have developed these productivity boosting skills apply for jobs at other companies, and either get those jobs or use the offer to negotiate a pay increase with their current employer.
- falloutx 8mo ago> apply for jobs at other companies Ahh, but its not 2022 anymore, even senior devs are struggling to change companies. Only companies that are hiring are knee deep into AI wrappers and have no possibility of becoming sustainable.
- ossa-ma 8mo agoI haven't seen any examples of that. Over the past few months mentions of AI in job applications have gone from "Comfortable using AI assisted programming - Cursor, Windsurf" to "Proficient in agentic development" and even mentions of "Claude code" in the desired skills sections. Yet the salary range has remained the exact same. Companies are literally expecting junior/mid level devs to have management skills (for those even hiring juniors). They expect you to come in and perform on the level of a lead architect - not just understand the codebase but the data, the integrations, build pipelines to ingest the entire companies documentation into your agentic platform of choice, then begin delegating to your subordinates (agents). Does this responsibility shift not warrant an immediate compensation shift?
- deleted 8mo ago[deleted]
- loveparade 8mo agoSlopware as a service?
- songodongo 8mo ago[flagged]
- rvnx 8mo ago[flagged]
- ImPostingOnHN 8mo agoPlease don't paste AI slop verbatim as a comment on HN. You can of course read it yourself, interpret it, verify it is correct, and post in your own words.
- replwoacause 8mo agoWow thanks for doing this! It's not like any one of us could've done the same thing had we wanted to, so really appreciate you taking this initiative.
- franktankbank 8mo agoThe only numbers mentioned are speed of output. Any associated loss due to rework/ missed contracts?
- Nextgrid 8mo ago> At a major semiconductor manufacturer, agents reduced chip optimization work from six weeks to one day. I call BS right there. If you can actually do that, you’d spin up a “chip optimization” consultancy and pocket the massive efficiency gain, not sell model access at a couple bucks per million-tokens. There should be a massive “caveats and terms apply” on that quote. So far the AI productivity gains have been all bark and no bite. I’ll believe when I see either faster product development, higher quality or lower prices (which indeed happened with other technological breakthroughs, whether the printing press or the loom) - if anything, software quality is going down suggesting we aren’t there yet.
- d--b 8mo agoMAybe the agent returned "nope, can't be optimized any more".
- wongarsu 8mo agoI'm willing to bet "chip optimization work" doesn't mean "the work required to optimize a chip", but "some work tasks performed as part of chip optimization". Basically they sped up some unknown subset of the work from six weeks to one day. Which could be big or could be negligible
- Der_Einzige 8mo agoIt's only time #50952 that scam altman has lied. He's in a race right now with Elon and Trump to see who can lie hardest and most often.
- deleted 8mo ago[deleted]
- bramhaag 8mo agoThey've already changed the wording to > At a major manufacturer, agents reduced production optimization work from six weeks to one day. Make of that what you will.
- 8mo ago
- techpression 8mo agoFunny how not a single one of those companies they use as examples works as a upsell for me. I’m clearly not the target audience.
- simianwords 8mo agoI didn't quite grasp what this is trying to solve but I hope its doing this: In our company we have a list of long tail "workflows" or "processes" that really just involves reading a document and filling a form. For example, how do I even get access to a new DB? Or a new AWS account? Can this tool help us create an agent that can automate this with some reasonable accuracy? I see OpenAI frontier as quick way to automate these long tail processes.
- infecto 8mo agoI think that’s sort of right. Said differently and the way I process these tools. You have mundane tasks that a human does where there are clear guidelines on acceptance. The underlying tools being used have clear APIs for automation. You can use natural language to automate said task without a full blown engineer in the loop. For non business engineers this sounds silly but it can save a lot of time for business users.
- TrackerFF 8mo agoIf your employee does (with intent/malice) something very egregious, you can always fire and sue them for the damage done. Out of curiosity, what will the option be if some AI agent does the same?
- imafish 8mo agoFire the employee that created the agent xD
- falloutx 8mo agoAnother day, another blog post about managing Agents. Its for pretend companies who think they are doing something worthwhile if they run 4000 agents at once.
- CuriouslyC 8mo agoThe animations look nice, but why does OpenAI want to be the substrate for intelligence? It's at a disadvantage there vs competitors with strong domain experience.
- chain030 8mo ago[flagged]
- mobiuscog 8mo agoCan those agents get my company legal team to approve the use of AI so I can at least try these modern things that make everyone's life better ? Because for many of us, AI is "not approved until legal say so".
- dbbk 8mo agoOpenAI's response: Start your own company
- spprashant 8mo agoThey are starting to sound less like a frontier AI lab, and more like a consultancy staffed with AI agents.
- louiereederson 8mo agoThis is a crowded solution space with participation from cloud, SaaS and data infrastructure vendors. All of these players and their customers have been trying to operationalize LLMs in enterprise workflows for 2+ years. Two big challenges are business ontology and fitting probabilistic tools into processes requiring deterministic outcomes. Overcoming these problems require significant systems integration and process engineering work. What does OpenAI have that makes them specifically capable of solving these problems over Azure, Databricks, Snowflake, etc., who have all been working on these problems for quite a while? I don't know if the press release really addresses any of this, which makes it seem more like marketing copy than anything else. The question of lock-in is also a major one. Why tether your workflow automation platform to your LLM vendor when that may just be a component of the platform, especially when the pace of change in LLMs specifically is so rapid in almost every conceivable way. I think you'd far rather have an LLM-vendor neutral control plane and disaggregate the lock-in risk somewhat.
- neom 8mo agoheh, I build something very very similar about 8/9 months ago, everyone thought I was full of it tho hehe. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44143928 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44143928
- written-beyond 8mo agoWhy didn't your VC friend drop some seed on you back then if the stealth startup was doing 25MM ARR? They probably could've had a better deal with you!
- neom 8mo agoOh they had $25MM in funding, $0 ARR - lol - the two reasons I decided to leave it as a weekend project: "Thanks!!! I decided not to build it, that space is already too busy, there is a startup with $25MM in stealth, who else is in stealth? On top of that, this method will get stale very very quickly, foundation model businesses are just too hard to work around right now, it's a silly way to do business. My magic is I've build a startup from scratch to over 400 people and watched what they do, it won't be long till that isn't worth much." and "I build it on my own over a weekend, on my own. I just wanted to confirm it can be done therefore will exist, that is all. Personally, I decided not to peruse it because I am old and lazy and don't want to compete against a16z and sequoia funded adderall filled teenagers." - 8 months forward I was right: If I could slap a bunch of python together and create business as a service that actually functions, in a weekend as just me, that's a feature on someone elses product! :)
- rognjen 8mo agoThe most interesting part of this is that OpenAI are no longer in the lead but are playing catch-up.
- 4corners4sides 8mo agoThis is OpenAI taking the concept of AI coworkers seriously down to the level of “identity” for these agents. This reminded me of Kairos which came up a few days ago (https://www.kairos.computer/ https://www.kairos.computer/) however I actually feel much better and more inspired at the angle OpenAI took than the angle kairos took. OpenAI’s genuinely feels like a platform for a coworker while Kairos is yet another cool landing page, yet another agent platform with X amount of data integrations. The use cases in OpenAI’s article also felt more concrete and impressive to be honest. The fact that “as agents have gotten more capable, the opportunity gap between what models can do and what teams can actually deploy has grown.” is definitely true. I think the analogy whose source I have forgot commented that we have F1 cars driving at 60/kmh so for a lot of enterprises they are not even at the deployment limit where improving benchmarks matter. They are still at the level of not being able to provide the right info, not having the right evaluation and improvement frameworks .etc. Using “Opening the AI Frontier” as a heading would be in really poor taste before OpenAI released their OSS models (earning their ClosedAI moniker) but I guess it’s a bit less offensive now. I think this product combined with OpenAI FDEs is going to make a lot of large industries inaccessible to startups but there may still be value in companies like Kairos watching what OpenAI does in this space and copying them.