5 ms·
> when notified, doing nothing about it When notified, he immediately: * "implemented technological measures to prevent the Grok account from allowing the e
by cbeach 8mo ago
> when notified, doing nothing about it
When notified, he immediately:
* "implemented technological measures to prevent the Grok account from allowing the editing of images of real people in revealing clothing" - https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/ce8gz8g2qnlo
* locked image generation down to paid accounts only (i.e. those individuals that can be identified via their payment details).
Have the other AI companies followed suit? They were also allowing users to undress real people, but it seems the media is ignoring that and focussing their ire only on Musk's companies...
- derrida 8mo agoThe other LLMs probably don't have the training data in the first place.
- chrisjj 8mo agoEr... "Study uncovers presence of CSAM in popular AI training dataset" https://www.theregister.com/2023/12/20/csam_laion_dataset/ https://www.theregister.com/2023/12/20/csam_laion_dataset/.
- afavour 8mo agoYou and I must have different definitions of the word “immediately”. The article you posted is from January 15th. Here is a story from January 2nd: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c98p1r4e6m8o https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c98p1r4e6m8o > Have the other AI companies followed suit? They were also allowing users to undress real people No they weren’t? There were numerous examples of people feeding the same prompts to different AIs and having their requests refused. Not to mention, X was also publicly distributing that material, something other AI companies were not doing. Which is an entirely different legal liability.
- bonesss 8mo agoThe part of X’s reaction to their own publishing I’m most looking forward to seeing in slow-motion in the courts and press was their attempt at agency laundering by having their LLM generate an apology in first-person. “Sorry I broke the law. Oops for reals tho.”
- chrisjj 8mo ago> Which is an entirely different legal liability. In UK, it is entirely the same. Near zero. Making/distributing a photo of a non-consenting bikini-wearer is no more illegal when originated by computer in bedroom than done by camera on public beach.
- techblueberry 8mo ago[flagged]
- freejazz 8mo agoKiddie porn but only for the paying accounts!
- moorebob 8mo agoWho's going to provide their payment details and then generate kiddie porn? This is a pretty pragmatic move by Musk. It's basically a honey trap, the likes of which authorities legitimately use to catch criminals.
- freejazz 8mo agoWho is going to generate kiddie porn on it in the first place? It's not as if a a lack of a credit card is preventing the authorities from figuring anything out. This is beyond ridiculous.
- apinksquash 8mo agoNah, Musk put out a public challenge in January asking anyone able to generate illegal / porno images to reply and tell him how they were able to bypass the safegaurds. Thousands of people tried and failed. I think the most people were able to get is stuff you'd see in an R-rated movie, and even then only for fictional requests as the latest versions of Grok refuse to undress or redress any real person into anything inappropriate. Here's the mentioned thread: https://x.com/elonmusk/status/2011527119097249996 https://x.com/elonmusk/status/2011527119097249996