3 ms·
He is against the "GPLv3 or later clause" because the FSF could change the license terms if it gets hijacked.
by imtringued 9mo ago
He is against the "GPLv3 or later clause" because the FSF could change the license terms if it gets hijacked.
- direwolf20 9mo agoHe is against the GPLv3 itself. He's ideologically opposed to converting the kernel to GPLv3, even if it was possible.