2 ms·
> It just means we don't let you starve if you don't work and we stop making you work out of fear of leaving you starve if you don't. Seems inefficient to pay
by aembleton 8mo ago
> It just means we don't let you starve if you don't work and we stop making you work out of fear of leaving you starve if you don't.
Seems inefficient to pay for everyone to have kitchens in their house and pay them cash to get ingredients to cook. Couldn't we just employ some of these people as cooks and have them make meals in a centralised kitchen in every neighbourhood? A bit like the British Restaurant idea: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Restaurant https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Restaurant
- Ey7NFZ3P0nzAe 8mo agoI don't see the connection with what we were talking about but: - soup kitchen are a thing: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soup_kitchen https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soup_kitchen - community fridges too: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Community_fridge https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Community_fridge - and historically in france where I'm from, when we started having freezer technology it first appeared in shared houses for the whole village. People would go there once a day to fetch what they needed and would eat it. Can't find english sources but it seems very efficient. A least much more than every one having a fridge. https://france3-regions.franceinfo.fr/pays-de-la-loire/mayenne/un-surgelateur-collectif-au-service-des-habitants-depuis-trois-generations-2950043.html https://france3-regions.franceinfo.fr/pays-de-la-loire/mayen...