4 ms·
>Is not a gift if it was stolen. Yeah, I had a visceral reaction to that statement.
by tonyedgecombe 9mo ago
>Is not a gift if it was stolen.
Yeah, I had a visceral reaction to that statement.
- amelius 9mo agoYet nobody is changing their licenses to exclude AI use. So I assume they are OK with it.
- oxag3n 9mo agoWhat's the point of changing the license? It will be scrapped anyway. 'The only winning move is not to play' - stop contributing to OSS.
- heavyset_go 9mo agoLicenses mean nothing if AI training on your data is fair use, which courts have yet to determine. You can have a license that says "NO AI TRAINING EVER" in no uncertain terms and it would mean absolutely nothing because fair use isn't dictated by licenses.
- its_ubuntu 9mo ago[dead]
- ouchiepouchie 9mo agoWhich God are you talking about, and how do you believe they have communicated this?
- wasmainiac 9mo agoI would and people do but no one respects the license because it is largely uninforceable
- its_ubuntu 9mo ago[dead]