3 ms·
You are either being disengenuous or you are horribly misinformed. The models that we currently call "AI" aren't intelligent in any sense -- they are statistic
by bigfishrunning 9mo ago
You are either being disengenuous or you are horribly misinformed.
The models that we currently call "AI" aren't intelligent in any sense -- they are statistical predictors of text. AGI is a replacement acronym used to refer to what we used to call AI -- a machine capable of thought.
- direwolf20 9mo agoEvery time AI research achieves something, that thing is no longer called AI. AI research brought us recommendation engines, spelling correctors, OCR, voice recognition, voice synthesis, content recognition, and so on. Now that they exist in the present instead of the future, none of these are considered AI.
- ares623 9mo agoThat's entirely the industry's fault though. They used AI to market those tools. And they continue to do so now.
- bigfishrunning 9mo agoThat's because once these things are achieved, they're not "Intelligent" -- usually it's some statistical or database management technique. Lots of stuff was invented at NASA that is only tangentially related to spaceflight. These other bits of software are tangentially related to AI research, but until the machine is "thinking", we don't have AI. That doesn't mean all of these things invented by the AI research community aren't useful, or aren't achievements; they are. We still haven't created AGI (which we used to call AI before LLMs could pass the turing test).