> It lacks the UNIX philosophy really. The UNIX philosophy is not a golden rule or inherently good. Nor is it even really well defined (what is a "thing"?). Sy

> It lacks the UNIX philosophy really. The UNIX philosophy is not a golden rule or inherently good. Nor is it even really well defined (what is a "thing"?). SystemD does one thing and does it well - managing Linux systems. > It's not "modernity" per se that obviously tops the list of criteria or we'd be using something like BeOS or even Windows. Just because modernity isn't the only criteria for success doesn't mean it is irrelevant.