2 ms·
Right, so that implies there's no need for homeowner subsidies in wealthy, developed countries.
by nradov 10mo ago
Right, so that implies there's no need for homeowner subsidies in wealthy, developed countries.
- zdp7 10mo agoNot really, unless you are just guessing. A quick read shows that solar gained popularity because of an unreliable grid and a removal of subsidies on diesel. Solar ended up being the cheaper and more reliable option. Labor costs for installation are also lower. In remote areas you may not even have a grid option. Simple general assumptions don't hold across vastly different geopolitical circumstances.
- nradov 10mo agoRight, so there's still no need for subsidies.
- pfdietz 10mo agoWhat's needed are Pigouvian CO2 taxes, but those aren't politically feasible.