4 ms·
I don't care about your "constitution" because it's just a PR way of implying your models are going to take over the world. They are not. They're tools and you
by behnamoh 9mo ago
I don't care about your "constitution" because it's just a PR way of implying your models are going to take over the world. They are not. They're tools and you as the company that makes them should stop the AGI rage bait and fearmongering. This "safety" narrative is bs, pardon my french.
- ramesh31 9mo agoIt's more or less formalizing the system prompt as something that can't just be tweaked willy nilly. I'd assume everyone else is doing something similar.
- nonethewiser 9mo ago>We treat the constitution as the final authority on how we want Claude to be and to behave—that is, any other training or instruction given to Claude should be consistent with both its letter and its underlying spirit. This makes publishing the constitution particularly important from a transparency perspective: it lets people understand which of Claude’s behaviors are intended versus unintended, to make informed choices, and to provide useful feedback. We think transparency of this kind will become ever more important as AIs start to exert more influence in society. IDK, sounds pretty reasonable.
- mmooss 9mo agoSee: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46709667 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46709667
- bigtex88 9mo agoThe amount of people that are SO CONFIDENT, like yourself, that this is PR BS is insane to me. What's the harm in acting this way towards the models? If they aren't sentient, then no harm no foul.