5 ms·

It's not losing it so much as that it is being destroyed on purpose.

by jacquesm 10mo ago

andsoitis 10mo ago
The decline has been gradual. The dollar's portion of global forex reserves has fallen from over 70% in the late 1990s to around 60%. The Supreme Court's ruling on Fed independency is to be watched.
- blurbleblurble 10mo ago
  Gradual isn't nearly profitable enough for some people.
- softwaredoug 10mo ago
  It may also point not just to decline in US stability but other areas of the world with stable monetary policy compared to the 90s
- TSiege 10mo ago
  You're also forgetting BRICs and the EU's efforts to create their own banking systems that would make it easier to do trade and finances without the dollar as an intermediary. The dollar being the reserve currency is going to be come more sudden once mass adoption of those platforms takes hold. Who can blame them with how the US is behaving
  - JumpCrisscross 10mo ago
    > BRICs and the EU's efforts to create their own banking systems One of these exists. The other is bluster.
    - direwolf20 10mo ago
      [dead]
  - ElectricalUnion 10mo ago
    "BRICS" is one of those organizations of countries that make even OPEC (famous for being non-commital, non-punishing, barely advisorial organization that doesn't meet it's own goals since the 1980's) look like a very serious group.
- blibble 10mo ago
  "at first you go bankrupt slowly, then all at once"
- marcosdumay 10mo ago
  Does your data include 2025? Because it was the only year with any international pushback at all, so we shouldn't expect the previous trend to stay unperturbed.
mkoubaa 10mo ago
When the debt gets this big and fixed obligations can't be changed devaluation becomes the only workable solution. Yet it's still robbery.
quantum_state 10mo ago
Would second what you said. Election has consequences. We better correct course soon before the country is made bankrupt.
rvz 10mo ago
[flagged]
nish__ 10mo ago
True. Good way to pay employees less. Edit: to the downvoters, did I lie?
- tclancy 10mo ago
  You seem to be talking about an alternative universe where employers are being paid in a different currency.
  - nish__ 10mo ago
    It's a conspiracy!
  - datsci_est_2015 10mo ago
    To be generous, asset holders are hurt less by a weakening dollar than non-asset holders (all else equal). To put it another way, do you think billionaires will let themselves suffer before their employees suffer?
deleted 10mo ago
[deleted]
lavezzi 10mo ago
It's being destroyed on purpose, with backing from the crypto industry who stand to have the most to gain at the expense of everyone else.
827a 10mo ago
The decline has been steady since ~2000. The US dollar being used less across the world has both negative and positive consequences for the US and USG. This is the Triffin Dilemma, and dates back to the 1960s; the USD's dominance over-values the currency relative to other currencies, which hurts exports and thus domestic manufacturing. It also conflicts USG/UST priorities between making decisions that are best for the US people, versus best for international customers of the dollar. Triffin covered this at length in his address to the Joint Economic Committee of Congress in 1959, but in short, the USD acting as world reserve currency creates demand for the dollar, which the US has to be able to supply, which pre-1971 meant extreme strain on her gold supply, and post-1971 means greater monetary inflation.
- wesapien 10mo ago
  Most think that the cracks in the financial system started to appear after 2008 (global financial crisis) and become truly visible after the financial system was weaponized through the seizures of Russian central bank USD reserves. It setup a precedent that it happened once it could happen again to some other country. Cheers to you for mentioning Triffin's dilemma. In my opinion, the dilemma is in the ability of the host country to be able to make "good use" of the exorbitant privilege. The financial system was not only used against other states but against its own people. Instead of developing the country and building equity through the middle class, it cannibalized its own.
sneak 10mo ago
By whom, for what purpose?
- datsci_est_2015 10mo ago
  The Trump cabinet is explicitly determined to improve its trade imbalance (export / import) and has spoken about the US dollar’s relative strength as a weakness in trade imbalance. There’s a delicate, fine line between dedollarization and a heavily weakened dollar, especially when the methods used are viewed as fickle and capricious (tariffs, threats). So it’s basically four choices: - Dedollarization is not happening (#nothingeverhappens) - Dedollarization is happening, but not because of anything the Trump admin is doing (lol) - Dedollarization is happening and the Trump admin is either causing it or exacerbating it, despite not coming out explicitly favoring it (they’re idiots) - Dedollarization is happening and it’s being orchestrated by the Trump admin (5d chess / malicious actors)

It's not losing it so much as that it is being destroyed on purpose.

The decline has been gradual. The dollar's portion of global forex reserves has fallen from over 70% in the late 1990s to around 60%. The Supreme Court's ruling on Fed independency is to be watched.

blurbleblurble 10mo ago
Gradual isn't nearly profitable enough for some people.
softwaredoug 10mo ago
It may also point not just to decline in US stability but other areas of the world with stable monetary policy compared to the 90s
TSiege 10mo ago
You're also forgetting BRICs and the EU's efforts to create their own banking systems that would make it easier to do trade and finances without the dollar as an intermediary. The dollar being the reserve currency is going to be come more sudden once mass adoption of those platforms takes hold. Who can blame them with how the US is behaving
- JumpCrisscross 10mo ago
  > BRICs and the EU's efforts to create their own banking systems One of these exists. The other is bluster.
  - direwolf20 10mo ago
    [dead]
- ElectricalUnion 10mo ago
  "BRICS" is one of those organizations of countries that make even OPEC (famous for being non-commital, non-punishing, barely advisorial organization that doesn't meet it's own goals since the 1980's) look like a very serious group.
blibble 10mo ago
"at first you go bankrupt slowly, then all at once"
marcosdumay 10mo ago
Does your data include 2025? Because it was the only year with any international pushback at all, so we shouldn't expect the previous trend to stay unperturbed.

mkoubaa 10mo ago

When the debt gets this big and fixed obligations can't be changed devaluation becomes the only workable solution. Yet it's still robbery.

quantum_state 10mo ago

Would second what you said. Election has consequences. We better correct course soon before the country is made bankrupt.

rvz 10mo ago

[flagged]

nish__ 10mo ago

True. Good way to pay employees less. Edit: to the downvoters, did I lie?

tclancy 10mo ago
You seem to be talking about an alternative universe where employers are being paid in a different currency.
- nish__ 10mo ago
  It's a conspiracy!
- datsci_est_2015 10mo ago
  To be generous, asset holders are hurt less by a weakening dollar than non-asset holders (all else equal). To put it another way, do you think billionaires will let themselves suffer before their employees suffer?

deleted 10mo ago

[deleted]

lavezzi 10mo ago

It's being destroyed on purpose, with backing from the crypto industry who stand to have the most to gain at the expense of everyone else.

827a 10mo ago

The decline has been steady since ~2000. The US dollar being used less across the world has both negative and positive consequences for the US and USG. This is the Triffin Dilemma, and dates back to the 1960s; the USD's dominance over-values the currency relative to other currencies, which hurts exports and thus domestic manufacturing. It also conflicts USG/UST priorities between making decisions that are best for the US people, versus best for international customers of the dollar. Triffin covered this at length in his address to the Joint Economic Committee of Congress in 1959, but in short, the USD acting as world reserve currency creates demand for the dollar, which the US has to be able to supply, which pre-1971 meant extreme strain on her gold supply, and post-1971 means greater monetary inflation.

wesapien 10mo ago
Most think that the cracks in the financial system started to appear after 2008 (global financial crisis) and become truly visible after the financial system was weaponized through the seizures of Russian central bank USD reserves. It setup a precedent that it happened once it could happen again to some other country. Cheers to you for mentioning Triffin's dilemma. In my opinion, the dilemma is in the ability of the host country to be able to make "good use" of the exorbitant privilege. The financial system was not only used against other states but against its own people. Instead of developing the country and building equity through the middle class, it cannibalized its own.

sneak 10mo ago

By whom, for what purpose?

datsci_est_2015 10mo ago
The Trump cabinet is explicitly determined to improve its trade imbalance (export / import) and has spoken about the US dollar’s relative strength as a weakness in trade imbalance. There’s a delicate, fine line between dedollarization and a heavily weakened dollar, especially when the methods used are viewed as fickle and capricious (tariffs, threats). So it’s basically four choices: - Dedollarization is not happening (#nothingeverhappens) - Dedollarization is happening, but not because of anything the Trump admin is doing (lol) - Dedollarization is happening and the Trump admin is either causing it or exacerbating it, despite not coming out explicitly favoring it (they’re idiots) - Dedollarization is happening and it’s being orchestrated by the Trump admin (5d chess / malicious actors)