3 ms·
This is why we need to ban targeted advertising. In fact, I think ads should be 100% opt-in. The user has to accept them or it is illegal to show them to the us
by nathan_compton 9mo ago
This is why we need to ban targeted advertising. In fact, I think ads should be 100% opt-in. The user has to accept them or it is illegal to show them to the user.
- mancerayder 9mo agoThat's what a generic semi-forced opt in via JavaScript is for, as we learn from the cookie opt in nonsense of EU sites. It's compliance for compliance sake.
- SpicyLemonZest 9mo agoBut what could an opt-in requirement for advertising possibly mean other than a compliance checkbox that 99% of users click through? It just seems like where you land if you start with the intuition that ad-supported platforms shouldn't be legal, realize that implementing that policy would ban all print media, and do your best to rescue it rather than abandon the idea as unworkable.
- yunwal 9mo agoIt’s not like print media would cease to exist if ad-supported models were made illegal. They would move to subscriptions like they had in the past.
- SpicyLemonZest 9mo agoPrint media have always run ads near-universally, regardless of whether or not they have a subscription.