3 ms·
Is it really this much slower than a Raspberry Pi 5? https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/compare/23667112?baseline=23629891 https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cp
by fulafel 9mo ago
Is it really this much slower than a Raspberry Pi 5? https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/compare/23667112?baseline=23629891 https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/compare/23667112?baseli...
tldr; 236 vs 666 single core score
- normie3000 9mo agoFrom your link it seems to be 3x slower. It's not clear to me why this comparison is relevant.
- fulafel 9mo agoI was wondering about the value proposition. But I guess it's a more like a dev / tinkering board then.
- moffkalast 9mo agoYep, the Pi 5 is an ARM though and you have to license the architecture to use it. RISC-V is open source, but currently sucks in pretty much all aspects compared to any other. This is still way in the early dev and build support phase.
- fweimer 9mo agoFor integer workloads it seems closer to 60% of RPi 5 performance. There are some benchmarks that depend on vector support or dedicated CPU instructions for good results, and they skew the results.
- 6SixTy 9mo agoA TL;DR doesn't explain everything. The Milk-V Titan doesn't have Vector instructions or crypto, while the Pi 5 does. It's very clearly a broken benchmark. This is why a bunch of RISC-V people won't buy boards without RV Vector instructions.
- fulafel 9mo agoIt's a broken benchmark since the CPU's shortcomings affect the results..?