3 ms·
There are going to be lots of languages competing with Rust and Zig. It's a popular, underserved market. They'll all have their unique angle.
by echelon 10mo ago
There are going to be lots of languages competing with Rust and Zig. It's a popular, underserved market. They'll all have their unique angle.
- pjmlp 10mo agoI has been served for several decades, however since the late-90's many decided reducing to only C and C++ was the way going forward, now the world is rediscovering it doesn't have to be like that.
- forgotpwd16 10mo agoThey're are certainly going to be lots of languages because now with LLMs it's easier (trivial?) to make one + library (case in point: just within last month there're have been posted here ~20 new langs with codebases 20k~100k LOC) but don't really see them competing. Rust and Zig brought actual improvements and are basically replacing usecases that C++/C had limiting the space available to others.
- imtringued 10mo agoUhm, no? There is barely enough space for Rust, which happens to have a unique feature/value proposition that raises it above the vast majority of its competitors. If you're fine with UB or memory unsafe code, then you go with C simply because its deeply entrenched. In that sense Zen-C changed too many things at once for no good reason. If it was just C with defer, there would have been an opportunity to include defer in the next release of the C standard.