6 ms·
I unironically loved my Windows Phone, it was great to develop for too coming from a WPF background at the time
by jmkni 9mo ago
I unironically loved my Windows Phone, it was great to develop for too coming from a WPF background at the time
- electroglyph 9mo agothe Nokia hardware was pretty great, too!
- mghackerlady 9mo agoNokias hardware has always been pretty good. Heck, some of the nokia branded HMD stuff is well built for the price
- Someone1234 9mo agoNokia's hardware managed to prove to me, that plastic done RIGHT, is just as good if not more practical than the metals we have today. They looked fantastic, legitimately didn't require a case, and held up very well.
- happymellon 9mo agoSome time after Apple discontinued the plastic Macbooks, I took mine in to get the battery replaced. I remember overhearing one of the sales folk having to explain to a woman that they can't sell her the white ones, only metal ones as she preferred the chunky plastic.
- lou1306 9mo agoAnd on most Lumias, if your phone got scratched, lost its shine, or you just got tired of the color, you could just walk to the store and get a new "shell".
- tgv 9mo agoI liked it too. But it never was great. E.g., I remember that the calculator had date computations, but the year input was a dropdown going from 1900 to 2100 or something like that. Look at all 5 of us reminiscing here...
- jkestner 9mo agoThere are dozens of us. Loved the Lumia hardware, loved maybe not that lack of polish in places but the overall UI vision was mostly well executed. Its rigid experience across apps feels quaint now, but if we had this focus now, we wouldn’t be seeing the Light Phone, b/w UI hacks, etc pop up.
- timpera 9mo agoSame here. My Lumia 635 was one of my best purchases ever, it was so capable for the price. It's a shame that they stopped believing in it.
- wiseowise 9mo agoIt was amazing. Ran circles around Android on weaker hardware, but because duopoly duo didn’t want to accept competitor it was artificially hamstrung and subsequently killed.
- whizzter 9mo agoNo, the death of Windows Phone was 95% the fault of MS/Nokia. Pre-announcing that they were leaving all Winphone 7 customers behind for Winphone 8 meant that every retailer/distributor was left with unsellable stock (because they hadn't gained enough traction to sell out initial shipments). If this was because Nokia made bad/cheap phones that were un-upgradeable or MS being arrogant isn't something I'm remembering anymore but the end-result was pissed retailers and nobody selling WP8.
- wiseowise 9mo agoThat was the final nail in the coffin. The reason why they didn't hit adoption in the first place is because Google prohibited their application on MS devices. Mobile YouTube already wasn't good enough, and without the rest of the GSuite (Maps, Gmail, Chrome, Calendar, Translate) it was dead in the water. And no, HERE maps and third-party clients were not good enough to tip the scale.
- toast0 9mo agoGoogle Mail and Calendar was fine; Google had an exchange connector at the time which worked well. (or well enough) But maybe Google would have updated their WinCE apps to WP7 if Microsoft didn't make them throw all their work away.
- IcyWindows 9mo agoGoogle had said they were killing the exchange connector and only changed their mind at the very end after Microsoft had written the workaround.
- tsimionescu 9mo ago
- rachr 9mo agoThe Lumia Icon/930 I had was genuinely the best phone I have ever used, from both a hardware quality and software perspective. It made the competing iPhone 5 look like garbage.
- snoman 9mo agoI honestly think that the windows phone development experience is where Microsoft majorly shit the bed. The sheer volume of breaking changes (and the severity of those breaks) meant rewriting a non-trivial amount of your app from version to version. I know multiple developers that just dropped support for windows phone as a result.
- alfiedotwtf 9mo agoI bought a 4G Nokia 3310 yesterday, and to be honest, it’s actually not bad!
- PeterStuer 9mo agoHow many abandoned attempts do you feel the Microsoft mobile developer ecosytem could take before losing all faith in yet another MS mobile strategy? In the mobile space, there was no market for just Windows Phone apps. You needed to support native Android and iOS already. WP was just another burden without a clear return. In their desperation they started paying college students for developing apps for the platform, leading to low quality experiences. They pushed WP hard to their channel. Many employees in MS system integrators and managed services got very cheap phones, but outside that group, just nobody bought them before in the end they started dumping them to the masses as cheapest phone in the store, but there ain't no serious market there either.
- pjmlp 9mo agoIt was about 10% in Europe when they killed it, many people that could not go for Apple due to their prices where actually going for Windows Phone, because the native code (WinRT/.NET Native/C++/CX), provided a much better experience in low end phones than Dalvik with its lousy JIT was capable of at the time. I was one of them, initially getting a Lumia as second phone even though as ex-Nokia I was kind of pissed off, developing for UAP/UWP grew on me and was much more fun than dealing with Android. Now given how Microsoft has messed up the whole UWP, Project Reunion and WinUI/WinAppSDK I would assert there is no faith left.
- pjmlp 9mo agoSpont on, I always considered WinRT, .NET Native, C++/CX is what COM evolution should have been back in 2001, instead of the J++ reboot. However the way Microsoft has messed it all up, no one is left besides Windows team and some hardcode believers, to care about WinRT/WinUI any longer than what is only available via WinAppSDK.
- EB-Barrington 9mo ago[dead]