4 ms·
You are absolutely right. My 22% was a mistake, the correct number is indeed 36.5% lower volumetric energy density. But that strengthens my argument, doesn't it
by credit_guy 9mo ago
You are absolutely right. My 22% was a mistake, the correct number is indeed 36.5% lower volumetric energy density. But that strengthens my argument, doesn't it?
- vrighter 9mo agoyes i agree with you on it being unfeasible for most applications.