3 ms·
But it’s not theft, because you’re not redistributing. It’s allowed, just like humans are allowed to learn from copyrighted content.
by dangoodmanUT 9mo ago
But it’s not theft, because you’re not redistributing. It’s allowed, just like humans are allowed to learn from copyrighted content.
- amelius 9mo ago> just like humans are allowed to learn from copyrighted content humans learning : machines learning == whale swimming : submarine swimming It's not the exact 100% same thing. Therefore you cannot base any rights on it. If you still don't buy it, consider this analogy: killing a human vs. destroying a machine Thank god that we're not using your line of thinking here.
- Agentus 9mo ago[dead]
- TrackerFF 9mo agoSure. But if I see listen to some song, and copy it, and release it, I could get sued. Even if I claim that I'm merely inspired by the original content - the court doesn't care. You don't need to redistribute the original material, it's enough that you just copied it.
- Altern4tiveAcc 9mo ago> But if I see listen to some song, and copy it, and release it, I could get sued. This is what should be fixed in the first place, then. You shouldn't get sued from what you do with your copy of a song.