3 ms·
But that would only hide the problem, doesn’t resolve the fact that models, in fact, violate copyright
by isodev 9mo ago
But that would only hide the problem, doesn’t resolve the fact that models, in fact, violate copyright
- jgalt212 9mo agoTrue, but it would certainly reduce litigation risk in so much as copypasta is ipso facto proof of copyright violation.
- protocolture 9mo agoThat hasnt been established. Theres no concrete basis to assert that training violates copyright.
- isodev 9mo agoEveryone knows that what models do to obtain training data is not legal. We just need a very old system about copyright to catch up already so we can ban the practice.
- protocolture 9mo ago"What they do to obtain" ah nice goal post shift. When legally obtained, training is fine. Training doesnt violate copyright. Unauthorised copying and distribution does. Which is why OpenAI should have just paid for physical copies of all those books and scanned them. >We just need a very old system about copyright to catch up already so we can ban the practice. No we really don't need copyright to get worse. Its pretty damn harmful as it is.