3 ms·
They could open source and not take contributions fwiw. They could close the issues and only allow discussions. There was a project mentioned here recently th
by rovr138 10mo ago
They could open source and not take contributions fwiw.
They could close the issues and only allow discussions.
There was a project mentioned here recently that did just that.
*Edit
It was Ghostty,
"Why users cannot create Issues directly" - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46460319 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46460319
- joelwilliamson 9mo agoThey could open source it and not even have a Github project associated. Just provide a read-only git repo on anthropic.com or drop a source tarball every release.
- hxugufjfjf 9mo agoThen a ton of vibe-coded Claude Code forks out of their control would pop up on GitHub and people would be even more frustrated at Anthropic for not fixing their issues.