26 ms·
Putting the "You" in CPU (2023)
- drob518 10mo agoGreat presentation.
- amelius 10mo agoMeanwhile, companies are taking the "You" out of the CPU so they can control your hardware and by indirection, you.
- high_na_euv 10mo agoHow?
- immibis 10mo agoSecure boot etc. It's in every ARM device, including the management engines in x64 devices (which are ARM devices).
- high_na_euv 10mo agoOh, I see. Fortunely there is still x86
- amelius 10mo agoThere is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_Management_Engine https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_Management_Engine Anyway, it will be maybe a few years until the governments will get the idea of enforcing their own management engines into our hardware :/
- LargoLasskhyfv 10mo ago> Oh, I see. No, you don't. Because of the SMI/ACPI/Intel Management Engine/AMD Secure Technology/UEFI, and optionally AMT-complex, where usually only parts of can be deactivated partially, but never all of it. It's actually more bad than the above mentioned ARM-stuff, which is misinformed(maybe because of raspberry piish broadcomisms, or locked down dumbphones), because on ARM, you either can disable that stuff, or even can run your own instead. https://www.trustedfirmware.org/projects/op-tee/ https://www.trustedfirmware.org/projects/op-tee/ https://github.com/OP-TEE https://github.com/OP-TEE https://docs.kernel.org/next/tee/op-tee.html https://docs.kernel.org/next/tee/op-tee.html
- hnuser123456 10mo agoYou would need to go back to ~2005-era Intel x86 CPUs to have x86 without a backdoor baked into the silicon (as far as we know), like Pentium 4. The Core 2 / Q6600 / P35 chipset already had an early version of it. Wikipedia says AMD added their equivalent, the Platform Security Processor, around 2013, so their best CPU from 2012 would be the FX-8350.
- kimixa 10mo agoI mean technically there's nothing they can do that SMM couldn't - introduced in a revision of the 386. It's code running with system permissions invisible to the "parent" user code and OS. You're already pretty much trusting the same people then as now, at least if they are "actively malicious".
- itopaloglu83 10mo agoGreat introduction to programming fundamentals as well. Being able to explain something this simply usually requires a very good understanding of the entire subject.
- napolux 10mo agohttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46574687 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46574687
- lucasoshiro 10mo agoSince the first time that I saw this here in HN I've been sharing it with several people around me. This including CS students, CS professors and non-technical people who only asked "how does a computer work?". I only say "just type 'cpu.land' and read that". This is one of the best things that I've found here.
- duo123 10mo ago[dead]
- duo123 10mo ago[dead]
- 30667952 10mo ago[dead]
- 30667952 10mo ago[dead]
- 30667952 10mo ago[dead]
- Isamu 10mo agoI think this is a good overview for most people, this is probably what they want. For me personally I was surprised given the name that very little is about cpus and most of the material is in the operating system.
- archmaster 10mo agoI guess I gotta write one about CPUs now ;)
- Isamu 10mo agoNo problem really, I think most people want to bootstrap quickly from the low level into the higher abstractions that they care about, few people want to stay down in the cpu itself.
- 30667952 10mo ago[dead]
- 30667952 10mo ago[dead]
- CagedCoder 10mo ago> The bottom of every page is padded so readers can maintain a consistent eyeline. God bless
- enricotr 10mo agoVery fine site!
- 30667952 10mo ago[dead]
- 30667952 10mo ago[dead]
- 30667952 10mo ago[dead]
- 30667952 10mo ago[dead]
- 30667952 10mo ago[dead]
- 30667952 10mo ago[dead]
- 30667952 10mo ago[dead]
- 30667952 10mo ago[dead]
- 30667952 10mo ago[dead]
- 30667952 10mo ago[dead]
- 30667952 10mo ago[dead]
- 30667952 10mo ago[dead]
- 30667952 9mo ago[dead]