4 ms·
i just gave my favorite LLM a screenshot of one of those components and it recreated it perfectly. i paid $0. i dont see how any business model can compete wit
by agentifysh 9mo ago
i just gave my favorite LLM a screenshot of one of those components and it recreated it perfectly. i paid $0.
i dont see how any business model can compete with free. maybe they can focus on branding like Pepsi or Coke and see if developers will make their decisions based on that.
- i_have_an_idea 9mo ago> i just gave my favorite LLM a screenshot of one of those components and it recreated it perfectly. i paid $0. Because it's most likely in the training data. I.e., it stole it for you.
- omnimus 9mo agoCopyright washing as a service.
- dormento 9mo agoY'know, this is the one time that i thought lawyers wouldn't let it slide. I still don't understand why apparently there aren't _massive_ class-action (or similar) lawsuits worldwide against AI companies. LLMs are full on copyright-removal machines.
- agentifysh 9mo agolawyers are paid to know legal from illegal thats why they charge thousands of dollars an hour.
- falloutx 9mo agohow do you know it recreated perfectly. Is it equally customizable? Is it equally accessible? And your LLM models cost money too. If you use the API keys, you can quickly see the cost.
- Jcampuzano2 9mo agoBeing 100% honest even though it sucks to be the truth - it doesn't matter if its customizable or accessible or not because you just ask the LLM to do that for you. Or ask the LLM to customize it to your specific use case since most people really only really care about their situation - not for it to be customizable to everyones use case.
- odie5533 9mo agoEven with AI, I'd still use a component library. It reduces the surface area you have to maintain and keeps your look consistent. The same reasons to use them before AI.