3 ms·
Something like this more or less happened during the initial Israeli strike on Iran ? From what I remember reading, they were able to gain air dominance not be
by TheAlchemist 9mo ago
Something like this more or less happened during the initial Israeli strike on Iran ?
From what I remember reading, they were able to gain air dominance not because Iranian air-defense was bad, but because it was put almost completely out of service for a brief period of time by people on the ground - be it through sabotage, cyber-warfare, drone attacks from inside, allowing the Israeli jets to annihilate them.
- catigula 9mo agoThe unquestioning logistical and intelligence support from the US military is truly formidable, and probably expensive.
- adolph 9mo agoSee the remotely operated Spike missiles: https://www.twz.com/news-features/spike-missiles-that-destroyed-air-defenses-from-inside-iran-were-remotely-operated https://www.twz.com/news-features/spike-missiles-that-destro...
- bawolff 9mo ago> not because Iranian air-defense was bad, but because it was put almost completely out of service for a brief period of time by people on the ground - be it through sabotage, cyber-warfare, drone attacks from inside, Wouldn't that constitute air defense being "bad"? There are no "well technically it should have worked" in war. Failing to properly secure the air defense sites is bad air defense.
- TheAlchemist 9mo agoNot really. Ferrari is a great car, but with punctured tires or bad driver, it won't win any race. Although I do agree, that in war only the final outcome is important. It's just that in this case it failed not necessarily because of technology, but because of humans.
- irishcoffee 9mo agoA Ferrari with punctured tires isn’t a great car, it can’t drive. It’s an immobile, useless hunk of metal with a great engine and transmission, similar to disabled air defense systems: really expensive, useless hunks of metal.