7 ms·

I imagine I'm not the only one using HN less because both articles like this and comments like this are clearly being downvoted and/or flagged by a subset of us

by slg 10mo ago

I imagine I'm not the only one using HN less because both articles like this and comments like this are clearly being downvoted and/or flagged by a subset of users motivated by politics and the HN admin team seemingly doesn't consider that much of a problem. This story is incredibly relevant to a tech audience and this comment is objectively true and yet both are met with downvotes/flags. Whether HN wants to endorse a political ideology or not, their approach to handling these issues is a material support of the ideologies these stories and comments are criticizing.

bakies 10mo ago
I think there's brigading coming in to ruin these threads. I had several positive votes for a few minutes when stating a simple fact about Elon Musk and his support of neo-nazi political parties then -2 a min later edit: back to 14, kinda crazy
- dzhiurgis 10mo ago
  [flagged]
femiagbabiaka 10mo ago
Anecdotally I think that moderation has been a lot more lenient when it comes to political content in the last year than in years prior. I have no hard evidence that this is actually the case, but I think especially pre-2020 I'd see very little political content on HN and now I see much more. It's also probably true that both liberals and conservatives have become even more polarized, leading to bad-faith flagging and downvoting, but I'm actually not sure what could be done about that, seems similar to anti-botting protections which is an arms race
- slg 10mo ago
  This story belongs on this site regardless of politics. It is specifically about both AI and social media. Downvoting/flagging this story is much more politically motivated than posting/upvoting it.
  - femiagbabiaka 10mo ago
    I agree with that. But one, it is on the site, and two, how can the moderation team reasonably stop bad actors from downvoting it? They can (and probably do) unflag things that have merit or put it in the 2nd chance queue.
    - slg 10mo ago
      > how can the moderation team reasonably stop bad actors from downvoting it There are all sorts of approaches that a moderation team could take if they actually believed this was a problem. For example, identify the users who regularly downvote/flag stories like this that end up being cleared by the moderation team for unflagging or the 2nd chance queue and devalue their downvotes/flags in the future.
      - femiagbabiaka 10mo ago
        I would be money that already happens, for flagging in particular, since it's right in the line of the moderation queue. For downvotes, it sounds like significant infra would be needed for a product that generates no revenue. Agree that I would like the problem to be solved as well however!
        slg 10mo ago
        >it sounds like significant infra would be needed for a product that generates no revenue This just describes HN as a whole, so if this is the concern, might as well shut the site down.
      - philipkglass 10mo ago
        That already happens. I got my flagging powers removed after over-using flag in the past. (I eventually wrote an email to the mods pledging to behave more judiciously and asked for the power back). As a user you won't see any change in the UI when this happens; the flags just stop having any effect on the back end.
- matsemann 10mo ago
  I've been using https://news.ycombinator.com/active https://news.ycombinator.com/active a lot more the last year, because so many important discussions (related to tech, but including politics or prominent figures like Musk) gets pushed out from the front page quickly. I don't think it's moderators doing it, but mass-flagging by users, (or perhaps some automagic if the discussion is too intense like num comments or downvotes). Of course, it might be the will of the community to flag these, but it does feel a bit abused in the way certain topics gets killed quickly.
  - bakies 10mo ago
    I just found out about this recently and like this page a lot. Dang has a hard job to balance this. I think newcomers might be more comfortable with the frontpage and if you end up learning about the other pages you can find more controversial discussions. Can't be mad about the moderation hiding these by default. Although I think CSAM-Bad should not be controversial.
  - iceflinger 10mo ago
    I have /active bookmarked and treat it as the real HN frontpage, maybe it should be at least linked at the top with the other views.
    - disgruntledphd2 10mo ago
      I think that would be bad for HN overall, it's really angry relative to the front page.
  - lynndotpy 10mo ago
    I also recommend enabling showdead. You will see a lot of vile commentary, but you will also see threads like this when they inevitably get flagged.
    - immibis 10mo ago
      You can also email hn@ycombinator.com to ask "why was this thing removed?", and they answer the first few, then killfile your sending address.
- lynndotpy 10mo ago
  Even a year ago, when Trump was posting claims that he was a king, etc. these things got removed, even though there were obvious implications on the tech industry. (Cybersecurity alone makes more political assumptions than it does on the hardness of the discrete logarithm, for example.) I (and others) were arguing that the Trump administration is probably, and unfortunately, the most relevant topic to the tech industry on most any given day. This is because computer is mostly made out of people. The message that these political stories intersect deeply with technology (as is seen here) seems to have successfully gotten through. I wish the most relevant tech story of every day were, say, some cool new operating system, or something cool and curiosity-inspiring like "you can sort in linear time" or "python is an operating system" or "i made X rewritten in Y" or whatever. I think in most things, creation is much harder than destruction, but software and software systems are an exception where one individual can generally do more creation than destruction. So, it's particularly interesting (and jarring) when a few individuals are able to make decisions that cause widespread destruction. We should collectively be proud that we have a culture where creation is easier than destruction. But it's also why the top stories of any given day will be "Trump did X" or "us-east-1 / cloudflare / crowdstrike is down" or "software widely used in {phones / servers} has a big scary backdoor".
  - jacquesm 9mo ago
    I think HN should just add another tab: Politics. That way the need for flagging goes down and everybody gets what they want. The main reason why you would want to keep politics off HN is because it turns would be friends, collaborators and people that respect each other into opposing factions (just like religion does). But in the end IRL that would come out anyway so better to have it up front. So I don't think it makes a difference in the long run.
- LightBug1 10mo ago
  Agreed. I've been treated with much more lenient hands here over the last 12 months. Possibly through obscurity. Now that you mention it - I've noticed the same on Youtube ... I used to get suspended every 5 minutes on there.
- ryandrake 10mo ago
  The wild thing is that this article isn't even a political issue! "Major Silicon Valley Company's Product Creates and Publishes Child Porn" has nothing to do with politics. It's not "political content." It is relevant tech news when someone investigates and points out wrongdoing that tech companies are up to. If another tech company's product was doing this, it would be all over HN and there would be pretty much no flagging. When these stories get flagged, it's because people don't want bad news to get out about the company--it's not about avoiding politics out of principle.
  - flir 10mo ago
    Free speech on the internet is the nerdiest of political issues, and this definitely plays to it. I'm not saying you're wrong about it being brigaded by PR bots, I'm saying it's still political. Hell, everything's political.
    - ndsipa_pomu 10mo ago
      I don't think this is really about free speech - the problem is the artificial speech being out of control.
- dang 10mo ago
  I'm late to this, but I'm doubtful that that perception is correct. It's true there are fluctuations, as with anything on HN, but the baseline is pretty stable. But the perception that HN has gotten-more-political-lately is about as old as the site itself. In fact, it's so common that about 8 years ago I took a couple hours to track down the history of it: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17014869 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17014869.
  - slg 10mo ago
    Any thoughts about the issues raised up thread? This article being flagged looks to me to be a clear indication of abuse of the HN flagging system. Or do you think there are justifiable reasons why this article shouldn't be linked on HN?
    - dang 10mo ago
      My thoughts are just the usual ones about this: flags of stories like this on HN are a kind of coalition between some flaggers who are agenda-motivated (which is an abuse of flagging) and other flaggers who simply don't want to see repetitive and/or flamebaity material on the site (which is a correct use of flagging, and is not agenda driven because this sort of material comes at us from all angles). When we see flaggers who are consistently doing the first kind of flagging, we take away their flagging privileges.
      - slg 10mo ago
        I don't know, I just searched "Grok" on HN and the 3 most popular stories of the last week have all been flagged killed while having 75+ points and 30+ comments. I can't imagine there are many single world searches that would return that result. I understand why you gave the general answer you gave rather than addressing this specific example, but I'll just say this story would be a good place to look for those potential "agenda-motivated" flaggers.
  - jacquesm 9mo ago
    I think it is a perception that is grounded in reality because the world itself is changing and HN reflects that change.
dec0dedab0de 10mo ago
I have downvoted anything remotely political on hn ever since I got my downvote button, even (especially) if I agree with it. I always appreciated that being anti-political was the general vibe here.
- slg 10mo ago
  How do you define “political” and what about the story of an AI posting CSAM do you think qualifies?
  - dec0dedab0de 10mo ago
    The part where you brought up politics is when I noticed it was political. But I generally consider something political if it involves politicians, or anyone being upset about anything someone else is doing, or any topic that they could mention on normal news. I prefer hn to be full of positive things that normal people don't understand or care about.
- immibis 10mo ago
  There's almost no such thing as a non-political thing. Maybe the sky colour, except that other cultures (especially in the past) have different green/blue boundaries and some may say it's green. Maybe the natural numbers (but whether they start from 0 or 1 is political) or the primes (but whether 1 is prime is political).
  - dec0dedab0de 10mo ago
    how insightful
- rsynnott 10mo ago
  What's political here? The mere fact of the involvement of Dear Leader? (As a long-term Musk-sceptic, I can confirm that Musk-critical content tended to get insta-flagged even years before he was explicitly involved in politics.)
  - 10mo ago
TitaRusell 10mo ago
I think lots of tech industry nerds feel that they are superior beings who are above politics. Kinda like the scientists building the atomic bomb. They'll be in for a rude awakening.
7e 10mo ago
You also can't downvote all comments, only a subset. HN is shit now.
xphos 10mo ago
Yeah this was my first reaction this article is about tech regulation that is relavent and on topic. If Grok causes extra legislation to be passed because its lack of comment dececeny in the pursuit of money that is relavent. This is the entire argument around we can't have accountability for tools just people which is ridicuously. The result of pretending that this type of thing doesn't happen is legislative responses.
Schmerika 10mo ago
PG and Garry Tan have both been disturbingly effusive in praising Musk and his various fuckeries. Like, the entirety of DOGE was such an obviously terrible series of events, but for whatever reason, the above were both big cheerleaders on Twitter. And yeah the moderation team here have been clearly letting everything Musk-related be flagged even after pushback. It's absolutely vile. I've seen many people try to make posts about the false flagging issue here, only to have those posts flagged as well (unapologetically, on purpose, by the mods themselves).
- jacquesm 9mo ago
  There is 'might makes right' and then there is 'money makes right'. At some point it isn't just who you are but also the company you keep and Musk is about as radio-active as it gets in that sense.

by slg 10mo ago

bakies 10mo ago

I think there's brigading coming in to ruin these threads. I had several positive votes for a few minutes when stating a simple fact about Elon Musk and his support of neo-nazi political parties then -2 a min later edit: back to 14, kinda crazy

dzhiurgis 10mo ago
[flagged]

femiagbabiaka 10mo ago

Anecdotally I think that moderation has been a lot more lenient when it comes to political content in the last year than in years prior. I have no hard evidence that this is actually the case, but I think especially pre-2020 I'd see very little political content on HN and now I see much more. It's also probably true that both liberals and conservatives have become even more polarized, leading to bad-faith flagging and downvoting, but I'm actually not sure what could be done about that, seems similar to anti-botting protections which is an arms race

slg 10mo ago
This story belongs on this site regardless of politics. It is specifically about both AI and social media. Downvoting/flagging this story is much more politically motivated than posting/upvoting it.
- femiagbabiaka 10mo ago
  I agree with that. But one, it is on the site, and two, how can the moderation team reasonably stop bad actors from downvoting it? They can (and probably do) unflag things that have merit or put it in the 2nd chance queue.
  - slg 10mo ago
    > how can the moderation team reasonably stop bad actors from downvoting it There are all sorts of approaches that a moderation team could take if they actually believed this was a problem. For example, identify the users who regularly downvote/flag stories like this that end up being cleared by the moderation team for unflagging or the 2nd chance queue and devalue their downvotes/flags in the future.
    - femiagbabiaka 10mo ago
      I would be money that already happens, for flagging in particular, since it's right in the line of the moderation queue. For downvotes, it sounds like significant infra would be needed for a product that generates no revenue. Agree that I would like the problem to be solved as well however!
      - slg 10mo ago
        >it sounds like significant infra would be needed for a product that generates no revenue This just describes HN as a whole, so if this is the concern, might as well shut the site down.
    - philipkglass 10mo ago
      That already happens. I got my flagging powers removed after over-using flag in the past. (I eventually wrote an email to the mods pledging to behave more judiciously and asked for the power back). As a user you won't see any change in the UI when this happens; the flags just stop having any effect on the back end.
matsemann 10mo ago
I've been using https://news.ycombinator.com/active https://news.ycombinator.com/active a lot more the last year, because so many important discussions (related to tech, but including politics or prominent figures like Musk) gets pushed out from the front page quickly. I don't think it's moderators doing it, but mass-flagging by users, (or perhaps some automagic if the discussion is too intense like num comments or downvotes). Of course, it might be the will of the community to flag these, but it does feel a bit abused in the way certain topics gets killed quickly.
- bakies 10mo ago
  I just found out about this recently and like this page a lot. Dang has a hard job to balance this. I think newcomers might be more comfortable with the frontpage and if you end up learning about the other pages you can find more controversial discussions. Can't be mad about the moderation hiding these by default. Although I think CSAM-Bad should not be controversial.
- iceflinger 10mo ago
  I have /active bookmarked and treat it as the real HN frontpage, maybe it should be at least linked at the top with the other views.
  - disgruntledphd2 10mo ago
    I think that would be bad for HN overall, it's really angry relative to the front page.
- lynndotpy 10mo ago
  I also recommend enabling showdead. You will see a lot of vile commentary, but you will also see threads like this when they inevitably get flagged.
  - immibis 10mo ago
    You can also email hn@ycombinator.com to ask "why was this thing removed?", and they answer the first few, then killfile your sending address.
lynndotpy 10mo ago
Even a year ago, when Trump was posting claims that he was a king, etc. these things got removed, even though there were obvious implications on the tech industry. (Cybersecurity alone makes more political assumptions than it does on the hardness of the discrete logarithm, for example.) I (and others) were arguing that the Trump administration is probably, and unfortunately, the most relevant topic to the tech industry on most any given day. This is because computer is mostly made out of people. The message that these political stories intersect deeply with technology (as is seen here) seems to have successfully gotten through. I wish the most relevant tech story of every day were, say, some cool new operating system, or something cool and curiosity-inspiring like "you can sort in linear time" or "python is an operating system" or "i made X rewritten in Y" or whatever. I think in most things, creation is much harder than destruction, but software and software systems are an exception where one individual can generally do more creation than destruction. So, it's particularly interesting (and jarring) when a few individuals are able to make decisions that cause widespread destruction. We should collectively be proud that we have a culture where creation is easier than destruction. But it's also why the top stories of any given day will be "Trump did X" or "us-east-1 / cloudflare / crowdstrike is down" or "software widely used in {phones / servers} has a big scary backdoor".
- jacquesm 9mo ago
  I think HN should just add another tab: Politics. That way the need for flagging goes down and everybody gets what they want. The main reason why you would want to keep politics off HN is because it turns would be friends, collaborators and people that respect each other into opposing factions (just like religion does). But in the end IRL that would come out anyway so better to have it up front. So I don't think it makes a difference in the long run.
LightBug1 10mo ago
Agreed. I've been treated with much more lenient hands here over the last 12 months. Possibly through obscurity. Now that you mention it - I've noticed the same on Youtube ... I used to get suspended every 5 minutes on there.
ryandrake 10mo ago
The wild thing is that this article isn't even a political issue! "Major Silicon Valley Company's Product Creates and Publishes Child Porn" has nothing to do with politics. It's not "political content." It is relevant tech news when someone investigates and points out wrongdoing that tech companies are up to. If another tech company's product was doing this, it would be all over HN and there would be pretty much no flagging. When these stories get flagged, it's because people don't want bad news to get out about the company--it's not about avoiding politics out of principle.
- flir 10mo ago
  Free speech on the internet is the nerdiest of political issues, and this definitely plays to it. I'm not saying you're wrong about it being brigaded by PR bots, I'm saying it's still political. Hell, everything's political.
  - ndsipa_pomu 10mo ago
    I don't think this is really about free speech - the problem is the artificial speech being out of control.
dang 10mo ago
I'm late to this, but I'm doubtful that that perception is correct. It's true there are fluctuations, as with anything on HN, but the baseline is pretty stable. But the perception that HN has gotten-more-political-lately is about as old as the site itself. In fact, it's so common that about 8 years ago I took a couple hours to track down the history of it: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17014869 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17014869.
- slg 10mo ago
  Any thoughts about the issues raised up thread? This article being flagged looks to me to be a clear indication of abuse of the HN flagging system. Or do you think there are justifiable reasons why this article shouldn't be linked on HN?
  - dang 10mo ago
    My thoughts are just the usual ones about this: flags of stories like this on HN are a kind of coalition between some flaggers who are agenda-motivated (which is an abuse of flagging) and other flaggers who simply don't want to see repetitive and/or flamebaity material on the site (which is a correct use of flagging, and is not agenda driven because this sort of material comes at us from all angles). When we see flaggers who are consistently doing the first kind of flagging, we take away their flagging privileges.
    - slg 10mo ago
      I don't know, I just searched "Grok" on HN and the 3 most popular stories of the last week have all been flagged killed while having 75+ points and 30+ comments. I can't imagine there are many single world searches that would return that result. I understand why you gave the general answer you gave rather than addressing this specific example, but I'll just say this story would be a good place to look for those potential "agenda-motivated" flaggers.
- jacquesm 9mo ago
  I think it is a perception that is grounded in reality because the world itself is changing and HN reflects that change.

dec0dedab0de 10mo ago

I have downvoted anything remotely political on hn ever since I got my downvote button, even (especially) if I agree with it. I always appreciated that being anti-political was the general vibe here.

slg 10mo ago
How do you define “political” and what about the story of an AI posting CSAM do you think qualifies?
- dec0dedab0de 10mo ago
  The part where you brought up politics is when I noticed it was political. But I generally consider something political if it involves politicians, or anyone being upset about anything someone else is doing, or any topic that they could mention on normal news. I prefer hn to be full of positive things that normal people don't understand or care about.
immibis 10mo ago
There's almost no such thing as a non-political thing. Maybe the sky colour, except that other cultures (especially in the past) have different green/blue boundaries and some may say it's green. Maybe the natural numbers (but whether they start from 0 or 1 is political) or the primes (but whether 1 is prime is political).
- dec0dedab0de 10mo ago
  how insightful
rsynnott 10mo ago
What's political here? The mere fact of the involvement of Dear Leader? (As a long-term Musk-sceptic, I can confirm that Musk-critical content tended to get insta-flagged even years before he was explicitly involved in politics.)
- 10mo ago

TitaRusell 10mo ago

I think lots of tech industry nerds feel that they are superior beings who are above politics. Kinda like the scientists building the atomic bomb. They'll be in for a rude awakening.

7e 10mo ago

You also can't downvote all comments, only a subset. HN is shit now.

xphos 10mo ago

Yeah this was my first reaction this article is about tech regulation that is relavent and on topic. If Grok causes extra legislation to be passed because its lack of comment dececeny in the pursuit of money that is relavent. This is the entire argument around we can't have accountability for tools just people which is ridicuously. The result of pretending that this type of thing doesn't happen is legislative responses.

Schmerika 10mo ago

PG and Garry Tan have both been disturbingly effusive in praising Musk and his various fuckeries. Like, the entirety of DOGE was such an obviously terrible series of events, but for whatever reason, the above were both big cheerleaders on Twitter. And yeah the moderation team here have been clearly letting everything Musk-related be flagged even after pushback. It's absolutely vile. I've seen many people try to make posts about the false flagging issue here, only to have those posts flagged as well (unapologetically, on purpose, by the mods themselves).

jacquesm 9mo ago
There is 'might makes right' and then there is 'money makes right'. At some point it isn't just who you are but also the company you keep and Musk is about as radio-active as it gets in that sense.