4 ms·

Kiwifarms is also a notable web site but they do not show a link to it. This means there is editorialisation going on.

• miroljub 9mo ago
  That's a common problem of English, German, and a few more Wikipedia editor gangs seeing themselves as the moral guardians of the internet. If you switch to some other languages, you'll find the links.
  • gpm 9mo ago
    Having a sense of morality is not a problem. Good for them.
    • schmuckonwheels 9mo ago
      [flagged]
      • taco_emoji 9mo ago
        So I guess your implication is that a catalog of sex acts is somehow immoral?
        • schmuckonwheels 9mo ago
          [flagged]
      • gpm 9mo ago
        Your point is that... Wikpedia editors choice to have articles about sex acts is morally inconsistent with a choice not to have direct links to a site a based around harassing, stalking, doxing, etc that has been directly tied to multiple suicides? I don't see the connection frankly. PS. English Wikipedia also does not appear to have an "Anal Creampie" article, let alone one with an animation.
        • schmuckonwheels 9mo ago
          [flagged]
          • gpm 9mo ago
            Oh look, an article which isn't titled what you claimed, or about what you claimed, and doesn't include an animation. Who? And I still don't see the moral relevance of any of this to choosing not to link to a site that has harassed people into killing themselves.
          • timeon 9mo ago
            How did you found the link?
          • BigTTYGothGF 9mo ago
            The picture clearly depicts--and believe it or not I never thought I'd write these words on the Hacker News internet forum sponsored by YCombinator--a vaginal creampie, not an anal one, nor does it seem to be, as you'd previously implied, animated.
• GuinansEyebrows 9mo ago
  reasonably explained by the chasm of difference in intent and impact between anna's archive and kiwifarms
• lazzlazzlazz 9mo ago
  [flagged]
  • slater 9mo ago
    It's none of those things.
  • gpm 9mo ago
    As much as I'd like to claim the values [1] that Wikimedia (the foundation behind wikipedia) supports as a progressive - I think they're quite independent of the progressive/conservative spectrum. [1] https://wikimediafoundation.org/public-policy/ https://wikimediafoundation.org/public-policy/
    • redeeman 9mo ago
      well I guess if they claim it themselves. I heard Israel doesnt think its comitting genocide, that Russia is rightously doing gods work. Whom did i hear it from? well, themselves of course!
      • soldthat 9mo ago
        [flagged]
  • metalliqaz 9mo ago
    As Stephen Colbert once said, "Everyone knows reality has a clear liberal bias." When conservatism has explicitly turned against enlightenment values, the opposite would be anti-conservative. I'm glad someone hasn't given up the fight.
• schmuckonwheels 9mo ago
  [flagged]
  • spencerflem 9mo ago
    What a crazy worldview: to think that good things are good and bad things are bad.
    • schmuckonwheels 9mo ago
      Who is the official judge and jury of the Internet?
      • spencerflem 9mo ago
        In this specific case of what’s allowed on wikipedia: the Wikimedia Foundation