3 ms·
How much of this was made with LLM?
by stephc_int13 9mo ago
How much of this was made with LLM?
- otterley 9mo agoWhy does it matter?
- greekrich92 9mo agoA bug from slop could cost $10K
- otterley 9mo agoSo could a bug introduced by a human being. What's the difference?
- hxugufjfjf 9mo agoAccountability is the difference.
- h33t-l4x0r 9mo agoHow exactly do end users hold AWS devs / AWS LLMs accountable
- otterley 9mo agoAn LLM is just an agent. The principal is held accountable. There’s nothing really all that novel here from a liability perspective.
- hxugufjfjf 9mo agoThat was my point exactly. I just didn’t write it as precisely as you.
- otterley 9mo agoThen I don’t understand. My point was that it doesn’t matter whether the machine or the human actually wrote the code; liability for any injury ultimately remains with the human that put the agent to work. Similarly, if a developer at a company wrote code that injured you, and she wrote that code at the direction of the company, you don’t sue the developer, you sue the company.
- greekrich92 9mo agoThe human
- rolymath 9mo agoHow much would a bug from a human cost?
- catlifeonmars 9mo agoI’d be willing to bet the classes of bugs introduced would be different for humans vs LLMs. You’d probably see fewer low level bugs (such as off-by-one bugs), but more cases where the business logic is incorrect or other higher concerns are incorrect.
- risyachka 9mo agoBecause when a project is done in 10 minutes by llm - it will be abandoned in a week. When a person intentionally does it and spends a month or two - they far more likely will support it as they created this project with some intention in the first place. With llms this is not the case
- otterley 9mo agoWhy are you entitled to ongoing support of a free tool? How long are you entitled to such support? What does “support” mean to you, exactly? If the tool works for you already, why do you need support for it?