5 ms·
If you call that AGI as many do or ASI, then we are not talking about the same thing. I'm talking about conversing with AI and being unable to tell if it's huma
by labrador 9mo ago
If you call that AGI as many do or ASI, then we are not talking about the same thing. I'm talking about conversing with AI and being unable to tell if it's human or not in kind of a Turing Plus test. Turing Plus 9 would be 90% of humans can't tell if it's human or not. We're at Turing Plus 1. I can easily tell Claude Opus 4..5 is a machine by the mistakes it made. It's dumb as a box of rocks. That's how I define AGI and beyond to ASI
- rvz 9mo agoThis goes for any experienced senior SWE individual with a sharp attention to detail can easily tell if an AI wrote a project or not. Right now the definition of AGI has been hijacked so much that it can mean absolutely anything.
- nutjob2 9mo agoNo one has even given a rigorous definition of AGI. A prime environment for snake oil salesmen like Altman and Musk.
- dragonwriter 9mo ago> No one has even given a rigorous definition of AGI. No one has even given a rigorous definition of the I, much less the G qualifier.
- nutjob2 9mo agoExactly.