2 ms·
No, it's not "restoring detail". The information is gone. It is predicting what the information might maybe have been like.
by ErroneousBosh 10mo ago
No, it's not "restoring detail". The information is gone.
It is predicting what the information might maybe have been like.
- memoriuaysj 10mo agoyou are arguing with math proofs here, the information is not gone, if it was a real video (as opposed to adversarily generated video)
- ErroneousBosh 10mo agoI'm struggling with the idea that you can use maths to recover information from a video that simply was not present in the video. I get that what you're describing can statisically "unblur" stuff you've blurred with overly-simplistic algorithms. I can provide you with real-world footage that has "natural" motion blur in it, if you can demonstrate this technique working? I'd really like to see how it's done.