4 ms·
10 years ago this wouldn’t have been a big deal but don’t think the US in its current form should be given access
by Havoc 10mo ago
10 years ago this wouldn’t have been a big deal but don’t think the US in its current form should be given access
- hulitu 10mo ago> 10 years ago this wouldn’t have been a big deal Famous last words
- DaSHacka 10mo agoMultiple countries have already been sharing this information between eachother and the U.S. to some capacity for some time now and hardly anyone raises a stink about it [0] except us old-man-yells-at-cloud folk. I think GP is right that if not for Trump, no one would care. Like the majority of the U.S.'s over-reaching policies that have largely only come under scrutiny in recent times (at least, amongst this audience). [0] https://www.biometricupdate.com/202406/five-eyes-biometric-data-sharing-increases-by-over-100x-with-little-transparency https://www.biometricupdate.com/202406/five-eyes-biometric-d...
- jandrewrogers 10mo agoThat ship sailed for the most part. This data is already commonly shared between countries.
- deleted 10mo ago[deleted]
- Hizonner 10mo ago10 years ago this would have been a big deal, because the US (or any country) can always change "forms". Actually that's why you shouldn't create databases like that to begin with.
- LightBug1 10mo agoMate, 10 years ago I would have raged about this ... and I'm ready to rage now.
- DANmode 10mo ago> 10 years ago this wouldn’t have been a big deal 2015 is later than 2013, which means you were all sorts of late, then.
- ronsor 10mo agoI like how your take-away is "the US is untrustworthy now" instead of a more general "tracking databases will always be abused eventually."
- ben_w 10mo ago"One of the current big supporters of freedom may hate and oppose your freedom during your lifetime" has always been a very hard sell. Show them examples of a free place becoming unfree? "Oh, we're different, that can't happen here".