4 ms·
I wish he talked about avidemux. It's a simple tool which is great for many things, it has filters and there are most of the formats. I think it uses ffmpeg un
by jokoon 9mo ago
I wish he talked about avidemux.
It's a simple tool which is great for many things, it has filters and there are most of the formats. I think it uses ffmpeg under the hood.
It's an old tool but it's fine for most things, when ffmpeg is to fastidious to use. ffmpeg is still what I use, but some more complex tasks are just more comfortable with avidemux.
- globnomulous 9mo ago> to fastidious Do you mean "too fussy?"
- dylan604 9mo agousing a sledge to drive a finishing nail? yes, it's still a hammer and it's still a nail, but still the wrong tool for the job
- dylan604 9mo agoSome of the simple tools might not be using ffmpeg per se, but using the libav or similar libraries. ffmpeg is just a tool built to utilize the functionality of multiple libraries like this.
- astrange 9mo agoffmpeg and libavcodec are the same project.
- dylan604 9mo agoyes. but do you have to include the ffmpeg part to include just the other libraries?
- astrange 9mo agoNo, ffmpeg itself is a pretty small wrapper around them. But the rest are true libraries and not frameworks, so you have to make all kinds of playback decisions yourself. A/V sync is hard.