3 ms·
> Loads for each set were adjusted to ensure that volitional fatigue was reached within 8–12 and 20–25 repetitions for the HL and LL limbs, respectively I wou
by vasco 10mo ago
> Loads for each set were adjusted to ensure that volitional fatigue was reached within 8–12 and 20–25 repetitions for the HL and LL limbs, respectively
I would argue both categories of the study are about low reps. I don't see how the body would tell the difference between 12 and 25 reps. If you said between 5 and 500, like it has to meaningfully take much longer, otherwise why would doing something so similar have any meaningful difference?
The way I think about it is that nature mostly reacts to order of magnitude changes. 12 to 25 is the same thing.
Like why not make a study to see if its more nutritious to eat dinner in 15 or 20 minutes?
- pjc50 10mo agoThis is spoken like you've never done any reps at all?
- vasco 10mo agoThere's not much difference in hitting max at 12 and at 25, from anecdotal experience. The study corroborated that as well, even though with small n.
- solumunus 10mo agoWhat do you mean by there’s no difference? The difference is in the relative load needed in each example.
- vasco 10mo agoWell of course you change the load, but the stimulus is interpreted the same way by the body. I didn't think the question was at that level.
- solumunus 10mo ago> but the stimulus is interpreted the same way by the body That may be your intuition, but it’s certainly not everyone’s, hence the studies… Many people will intuit heavier weight = more effective.
- machomaster 10mo agoExcept that this is something that was well established before, making this study pointless.
- vasco 10mo agoIt's not my intuition, it's just knowledge about processes in nature. Almost nothing reacts to changes smaller than an order of magnitude to anything. It's one of the best rules of thumb.
- mnky9800n 10mo agoI feel like I would definitely notice if I went from 12 to 25 reps on any exercise I do. Although typically I max out at 8 before adding more weight.
- Dylan16807 10mo ago> I feel like I would definitely notice if I went from 12 to 25 reps on any exercise I do. To be clear, the implication is that 12 and 25 have different weights so they tire you the same amount. Do you think it would be a very strongly felt difference in that situation? What would the difference feel like?
- mnky9800n 10mo agoYes, this is why classic body builders like high reps because they get the pump but you can get the same growth (and there’s lots of research saying more) with training to failure with low reps and high weight but it doesn’t give you the pump.
- Dylan16807 10mo agoWell the idea in the earlier comment is that a 2x rep difference isn't very much to be the difference between "low" and "high". It's not disputing that you can get a difference, but saying the study didn't try very hard to probe it.
- vasco 10mo agoYou consciously notice of course, like what kind of argument is that. The point is the stimulus is the same for the body unless you change it by orders of magnitude, the study agrees that this is the same also.
- machomaster 10mo agoOf course you would personally notice. But the parent was talking about the effect on muscles. And it has been long estsblished that 5-30 reps (perhaps even highter) will cause the same hypertrophy. Obviously, for practical reasons the optimal range for each exercise will vary. For squat 5-10 is definitely better than 10-20 let alone 20-30. For DB side raises highter reps would feel better than the lower rep range.