4 ms·
I really want the world to move on from monorepos to multirepos. Git submodules set multirepos back by 10 years, but they still make more sense. The are composa
by conartist6 10mo ago
I really want the world to move on from monorepos to multirepos. Git submodules set multirepos back by 10 years, but they still make more sense. The are composable!
- bulbar 10mo agoMy impression is that the world moved on from multirepo to monorepo and I vaguely remember that git submodules have some serious gotchas.
- tedmiston 10mo agohttps://diziet.dreamwidth.org/14666.html#what-is-wrong-with-git-submodules https://diziet.dreamwidth.org/14666.html#what-is-wrong-with-...
- conartist6 10mo agoyeah, I dunno how else to say it except that if this feature worked right people would like it
- maxvirrozeito 10mo agoFor me, integrating features that spans multiple repositories means coordinating changes, multiple PRs, switching branches on many repos to do testing. Quite time consuming. I did use submodules but I find monorepo easier to manage
- conartist6 10mo agoI don't doubt that it is. Monorepo tools are much better right now. But monorepos don't compose. They don't branch. They don't scale.