3 ms·

Still the same flaw in his analysis. Humans are unreliable too and the entire damn economy runs on them. You just need good enough, and AI is getting better dai

• grim_io 11mo ago
  It only gets better daily at stuff it already kinda could do. It can write my code a bit less shitty tomorrow, but that doesn't sound like the fulfillment of the promises given. Tomorrow, another company will yet again fail to integrate agentic workflows.
  • Havoc 11mo ago
    That seems true. Even with current abilities if they're just rolled out it's still trillions of the economy. A bit like OK Waymo isn't perfect but it works in SF...we don't need a giant breakthrough to bring it to another 1000 cities. Everyone is focused on how to make the models better (rightly), but impact and economic viability is in implementation and there is a lot of low hanging fruit there. >another company will yet again fail to integrate agentic workflows. 'tis true
    • camgunz 10mo ago
      > A bit like OK Waymo isn't perfect but it works in SF...we don't need a giant breakthrough to bring it to another 1000 cities Well, a lot of cities have snow, or different flora and fauna, or different road rules (Karachi, Mexico City). Maybe the same approach works (spend hellacious amounts of money to train) but again, for what economic benefit?
• thegrim000 11mo ago
  What analysis? There is no analysis. "The economics don't make sense to me and therefore it'll crash and burn", and "here's two articles from mainstream media that are worried about AI spending". That's the extent of the article's content. That's the extent of the analysis. He himself offers absolutely zero argument, data, or facts.