3 ms·

I am not fucking around when I say incompatible with my existence. Of course I don't mean getting murdered, but advocating conversion therapy gets pretty close.

by _cenw 10mo ago

I am not fucking around when I say incompatible with my existence. Of course I don't mean getting murdered, but advocating conversion therapy gets pretty close. https://world.hey.com/dhh/bad-therapy-08849dc9 https://world.hey.com/dhh/bad-therapy-08849dc9 I wouldn't be around if this was policy where I live (Let's put aside that the UK is in fact pretty fucked on that)

IshKebab 10mo ago
See at this point you're boycotting a company for supporting a developer who wrote a favourable book review of someone that has unproven and controversial but absolutely not fringe views about transgender issues that you disagree with. > I wouldn't be around if this was policy where I live If what was policy? Higher thresholds for mental health diagnoses? Cancel culture isn't a good thing, left or right.
- _cenw 10mo ago
  [flagged]
- ixci 10mo ago
  [flagged]
  - _cenw 10mo ago
    You can believe whatever bioessentialist crap you want as long as you leave us alone.
    - ixci 10mo ago
      That advice would be much better directed toward the activists trying to force "gender identity" nonsense into law and policy.
      - _cenw 10mo ago
        Name a law that fits this category that'd personally affect you.
        ixci 10mo ago
        Section 51 of the California Civil Code, for example.
        _cenw 10mo ago
        Personally. Not extrapolating from whatever toxic waste you consume online. My bet is that you're not even in California. But even if you are. What hardship has an open definition of sex to include gender identity and expression inflicted upon you. Please, be specific.
        ixci 10mo ago
        My local gym has men in the locker room and it's illegal for the gym to kick them out as these men say they are women. I changed gyms because of this but this only avoids the problem. Many women quietly self-exclude.
- seethedeaduu 10mo ago
  "favourable book review of someone that has unproven and controversial but absolutely not fringe views" imagine saying this in 1930 and suddenly it doesn't sound as innocent. Leave trans people alone.

by _cenw 10mo ago

IshKebab 10mo ago

See at this point you're boycotting a company for supporting a developer who wrote a favourable book review of someone that has unproven and controversial but absolutely not fringe views about transgender issues that you disagree with. > I wouldn't be around if this was policy where I live If what was policy? Higher thresholds for mental health diagnoses? Cancel culture isn't a good thing, left or right.

_cenw 10mo ago
[flagged]
ixci 10mo ago
[flagged]
- _cenw 10mo ago
  You can believe whatever bioessentialist crap you want as long as you leave us alone.
  - ixci 10mo ago
    That advice would be much better directed toward the activists trying to force "gender identity" nonsense into law and policy.
    - _cenw 10mo ago
      Name a law that fits this category that'd personally affect you.
      - ixci 10mo ago
        Section 51 of the California Civil Code, for example.
        _cenw 10mo ago
        Personally. Not extrapolating from whatever toxic waste you consume online. My bet is that you're not even in California. But even if you are. What hardship has an open definition of sex to include gender identity and expression inflicted upon you. Please, be specific.
        ixci 10mo ago
        My local gym has men in the locker room and it's illegal for the gym to kick them out as these men say they are women. I changed gyms because of this but this only avoids the problem. Many women quietly self-exclude.
seethedeaduu 10mo ago
"favourable book review of someone that has unproven and controversial but absolutely not fringe views" imagine saying this in 1930 and suddenly it doesn't sound as innocent. Leave trans people alone.