3 ms·
So it is not structured as an acquisition to avoid anti trust but effectively it probably is.
by justincormack 10mo ago
So it is not structured as an acquisition to avoid anti trust but effectively it probably is.
- whatsupdog 10mo agoYes I'm sure that "non exclusive" partnership is exactly that, wink wink!
- DivingForGold 10mo agoIndeed, as justincormack comments: ”It is not structured as an outright acquisition to avoid US Gov't anti trust scrutiny, but effectively it probably is”. “Non-exclusive” ? Ummmm, yeah, right, sure. You can probably bet there is an private understanding that Groq will no longer offer it's “top of the line” best technology to competitors of Nvidia. Some may see this as a clever, “slight of the hand” attempt for Nvidia to maintain it's perceived dominance & lead in GPU-TPU development. “Non-exclusive” does not in any form or fashion spell out that all Nvidia's competitors can and will obtain the very top, cutting edge Groq technology as Nvidia will obtain . . .
- biggc 10mo agoWhat generated this comment?
- rising-sky 10mo agoGrok... with a k
- symbogra 10mo agoProbably a good old fashioned Mk 1 Human Brain given the use of "slight of hand"
- janderson215 10mo agoGPT1 Nano
- deaux 10mo agoLooks like a normal comment to me, what makes you think otherwise? It has pretty much no hallmarks of being generated, and plenty that point towards the opposite.
- squigz 10mo agoStarting the comment pointing out the name of the user you're replying to, and quoting the exact comment you're replying to, does sound really strange.
- tibbar 10mo agoI think it's intended as a response to a sibling comment.
- ilikehurdles 10mo agoQuoting the user it’s replying to in third person, and then hallucinating words inside the quote. When I have asked LLMs to read/dictate a linked text, the output is usually not a clean read but something reinterpreted with its own style.