4 ms·

So is the data extracted the names of the victims that were supposed to be hidden to protect them? Or is there something else that might be worthy of exposing?

by xhkkffbf 10mo ago

kjkjadksj 10mo ago
There are pages that are nothing but redacted text. It isn’t going to be a victims name copy pasted 80 times in a row…
- wafflemaker 10mo ago
  >It isn’t going to be a victims name copy pasted 80 times in a row… You can't possibly know that! (Sorry, watching Grinch, Jim Carrey spoke through me).
tempaccountabcd 10mo ago
[dead]
kgwxd 10mo ago
i assume the downvoters don't see the importance of the question.
- watwut 10mo ago
  The downvoters assume that it is a bad faith question. The downvoters are 99% right with that. If the 1% hit then OP is just exceedingly naive and did not followed the scandal in which case they should maybe first do some reading. The names of involved powerful people were NOT supposed to be censored. All those names except Bill Clinton name were redacted. To protect Trump and everybody else involved in the scandal except said Bill Clinton. But especially to protect Trump.
  - mapontosevenths 10mo ago
    They also obscured the male perpetrators faces and bodies in many images, illegaly.
    - mindslight 10mo ago
      I assume that de facto federal "law" now makes it illegal to be raped, and those men are the victims. That would be a logical conclusion of edgelord vice signalling, right?
      - mapontosevenths 10mo ago
        I know what all of these words mean, but not when they're in this order.
  - kgwxd 10mo ago
    I took the question to mean "were the easily circumvented redactions only covering victim details, and maybe suspects from Team Not-One-of-Us?" Implying the "stupidity" card was played to cover the "malice" card.
deepsquirrelnet 10mo ago
It seems the redactions are to protect the perpetrators.
JKCalhoun 10mo ago
I'm seeing, for example, "Hyperion Air, Inc" was redacted. Victim?

So is the data extracted the names of the victims that were supposed to be hidden to protect them? Or is there something else that might be worthy of exposing?

kjkjadksj 10mo ago

There are pages that are nothing but redacted text. It isn’t going to be a victims name copy pasted 80 times in a row…

wafflemaker 10mo ago
>It isn’t going to be a victims name copy pasted 80 times in a row… You can't possibly know that! (Sorry, watching Grinch, Jim Carrey spoke through me).

tempaccountabcd 10mo ago

[dead]

kgwxd 10mo ago

i assume the downvoters don't see the importance of the question.

watwut 10mo ago
The downvoters assume that it is a bad faith question. The downvoters are 99% right with that. If the 1% hit then OP is just exceedingly naive and did not followed the scandal in which case they should maybe first do some reading. The names of involved powerful people were NOT supposed to be censored. All those names except Bill Clinton name were redacted. To protect Trump and everybody else involved in the scandal except said Bill Clinton. But especially to protect Trump.
- mapontosevenths 10mo ago
  They also obscured the male perpetrators faces and bodies in many images, illegaly.
  - mindslight 10mo ago
    I assume that de facto federal "law" now makes it illegal to be raped, and those men are the victims. That would be a logical conclusion of edgelord vice signalling, right?
    - mapontosevenths 10mo ago
      I know what all of these words mean, but not when they're in this order.
- kgwxd 10mo ago
  I took the question to mean "were the easily circumvented redactions only covering victim details, and maybe suspects from Team Not-One-of-Us?" Implying the "stupidity" card was played to cover the "malice" card.

deepsquirrelnet 10mo ago

It seems the redactions are to protect the perpetrators.

JKCalhoun 10mo ago

I'm seeing, for example, "Hyperion Air, Inc" was redacted. Victim?