4 ms·
Yes. Especially when you factor in that github does a startlingly bad job of many basic things. Their ticketing system blows, for example -- you can't prioriti
by timr 14y ago
Yes. Especially when you factor in that github does a startlingly bad job of many basic things. Their ticketing system blows, for example -- you can't prioritize anything. Yet they have time to implement a CLI in the search bar...
I moved my personal private repos to BitBucket a long time ago, and haven't looked back.
- grandalf 14y agothe cli stuff is very simply implemented, but cool nonetheless.
- gcr 14y agoYou can reorder tasks by clicking and dragging, and you can assign discrete priorities with labels. What more do you need?
- edmccard 14y ago>What more do you need? Well, when you've got a large list of things stored on a computer, and you want them displayed in a certain order, automatic sorting (after you assign a priority) is a lot more useful than having to rearrange them manually.
- gcr 14y agoI thought assigning priority labels is manual anyway? I mean, if you want to build a natural language parser that counts how many times the words "URGENT" and "HELP" appears in the issue and then automatically reorders it, you can do that with the Github issues API anyways, right? I don't know of existing bug trackers that make priority automatic. You can filter based on labels in github issues, if that's what you meant.
- zalew 14y agothat's an example of why I stick with Bitbucket and don't bother to switch to Github with my projects although it's so hyped. Bitbucket works great, gets the job done, their commit log beats up the gihub one, and they don't focus on implementing useless bells and whistles.