3 ms·
You are describing Searle's "Chinese Room argument"[1] to some extent. It's been discussed a lot recently, but anyone who has interacted with LLMs at a deeper
by mlmonkey 10mo ago
You are describing Searle's "Chinese Room argument"[1] to some extent.
It's been discussed a lot recently, but anyone who has interacted with LLMs at a deeper level will tell you that there is something there; not sure if you'd call it "intelligence" or what. There is plenty of evidence to the contrary too. I guess this is a long-winded way of saying "we don't really know what's going on"...
[1] https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/chinese-room/ https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/chinese-room/
- x______________ 10mo agoIf an LLM was intelligent, wouldn't it get bored?
- jimbokun 10mo agoWhy should it?