4 ms·

Codeberg's uptime is so bad, that it actually makes GitHub look good. ~96.5% over last 2 weeks [1] [1]: https://status.codeberg.org/status/codeberg https://sta

• azemetre 10mo ago
  I'm sure if Codeberg had equivalent resources they'd be good, hard to fault a nonprofit for not benefiting from a trillion dollar multinational corporation. What was GitHub's excuse for their failures?
  • nine_k 10mo ago
    Are they a profit center yet?
  • StrLght 10mo ago
    I am not criticizing Codeberg, I'm just adding context that seems very important from my experience. As mentioned above — I am glad that they exist and do what they do. However, that doesn't mean I should ignore issues like this.
• miclill 10mo ago
  The operate on less than 100_000€/year, so I would cut them some slack ;-) btw. codeberg is not a company, more like a foundation, Verein is the german word.
  • StrLght 10mo ago
    I fail to see how this is relevant to the point I was making. With uptime being so low, it's not a viable alternative: budget / resources / etc. don't change that fact. Don't get me wrong — I am glad that they are doing what they're doing, but it's a long way until it becomes a real alternative.
• array_key_first 10mo ago
  We don't actually know what githubs uptime is because they don't say. If you told me it's less than 96.5, I might believe you, particular for actions.