Yep, nuance is definitely needed. The greater issue is orthogonal: pushing out unfinished and incompatible code as production-usable rather code written in anot

Yep, nuance is definitely needed. The greater issue is orthogonal: pushing out unfinished and incompatible code as production-usable rather code written in another language. Rust, by itself, isn't a panacea to add formal verification but one leg on the footstool of formal verification methodologies to produce safe(r/ish) software rather than subtly buggy software that's difficult to prove correct and more expensive to maintain. "If it aint broke don't fix it" =~= "I've never gotten into an accident until now, so airbags and seatbelts are pointless." ==> reactive methodology / failure / hubris