5 ms·

Is there any factual basis to this claim, or just your personal opinion? It's like claiming Oracle's real business isn't a database, but rather stealing custome

by ishi 10mo ago

Is there any factual basis to this claim, or just your personal opinion? It's like claiming Oracle's real business isn't a database, but rather stealing customers data which was stored in Oracle's databases. Or practically any other company that has access to customers data.

deleted 10mo ago
[deleted]
cluckindan 10mo ago
Are you sure such claims about Oracle are completely unfounded?
- ishi 10mo ago
  It's easy to make baseless accusations that are impossible to disprove, that's exactly my point.
  - cluckindan 10mo ago
    Come on. The CIA was Oracle’s first customer.
- kasey_junk 10mo ago
  This framing is a cheap rhetorical trick. Restated this leads to the statement “all companies by default are in the business of capturing customer data, all other claims about their product and smoke screens to hide that.” Which is something you can believe but it falls into the extraordinary claims, extraordinary evidence category. But by claiming it about Oracle or Israeli cyber firms or whatever you swap the evidence burden to the person who has the not extraordinary claim, that most businesses are doing what it claims on the tin.
  - chiefalchemist 10mo ago
    Books such as: “The Age of Surveillance Capitalism” and “Stand Out of Our Light” might not change your mind, but you’re likely to end up realizing customer data hovering is more of a driver of modern business decisions than you realize. To say nothing of the assets such activities provide the intelligence communities. This is happening. Please don’t dismiss it as conspiracy theory.
  - coliveira 10mo ago
    It's not just a rhetorical trick. Amazon collects most of their data in Virginia, right at the doorsteps of a well known "intelligence" org in the USA. These companies that handle data all around the world are authorized to exist for some reason...
    - kasey_junk 10mo ago
      Then the argument should be that. Not “hey commenter you must prove a never ending set of ‘now do Oracle’, ‘now do Amazon’”. Say the words “I believe all companies exist as an extension of the US intelligence apparatus” and claim the burden for yourself.
      - cluckindan 10mo ago
        That is a strawman argument. Oracle gets its name from a codename of a 1977 project for the Central Intelligence Agency, Oracle's first customer. In 2004, then-United States Attorney General John Ashcroft sued Oracle Corporation to prevent it from acquiring a multibillion-dollar intelligence contract. After Ashcroft's resignation from government, he founded a lobbying firm, The Ashcroft Group, which Oracle hired in 2005. With the group's help, Oracle went on to acquire the contract. Following the beginning of the Gaza war in 2023, Oracle’s top executives, including Safra Catz and Larry Ellison, publicly aligned the company with Israel’s military operations. They issued statements of solidarity, paid double salaries to Israeli employees, and donated to organizations connected to Israel’s wartime response.
        kasey_junk 10mo ago
        See. Thats a good comment. “Your use of Oracle is a bad counter factual because…” Switching to that is commenting in good faith. It educates and argues the point and makes it clear that you aren’t in fact claiming that all companies are surveillance state apparatus. Note that other commenters ran with the “but they are actually argument” because the door was opened.
Fnoord 10mo ago
> Is there any factual basis to this claim Please feel free to translate and read the Dutch version of this article. On the bottom, several security researchers found vulnerabilities in Zivver [1] [1] https://www.ftm.nl/artikelen/vertrouwelijke-zaken-te-grabbel-na-overname-zivver-door-kiteworks https://www.ftm.nl/artikelen/vertrouwelijke-zaken-te-grabbel...
- ishi 10mo ago
  So Zivver created a product with security vulnerabilities, Kitenet bought Zivver (probably for their customer base), and it's all some sort of conspiracy to steal personal data?
  - chiefalchemist 10mo ago
    To be fair, it’s not a conspiracy if it actually happens. It’s surprising how often this type of reasoning is still so common.
    - dlubarov 10mo ago
      What are you saying actually happened? It sounds like the concern is that in a certain context, messages are cloud hosted instead of client-side e2e encrypted? Did anyone even claim otherwise? How is this different from suggesting Netflix was all a secret plot by Stanford to spy on Europeans' TV binging?
      - Fnoord 10mo ago
        Two anonymous security researchers working at Dutch government found the data is send plaintext [1]. One independent security researcher was able to verify their claim. This should be a concern if the company is owned by Dutch people, but more so if it is owned by a company with questionable jurisdiction. Which unfortunately the USA and Israel are these days. [1] https://www.ftm.nl/artikelen/vertrouwelijke-zaken-te-grabbel-na-overname-zivver-door-kiteworks https://www.ftm.nl/artikelen/vertrouwelijke-zaken-te-grabbel...
nunobrito 10mo ago
It is an obvious and recurring phenomenon to anyone minimally following cybersecurity topics. This isn't the first time, nor the second, nor the third, nor the last. This is the same as claiming that water isn't wet until someone here on HN brings you 10 articles and news proving otherwise. This particular topic was never really denied, nor even by the authors themselves as you can read on the article.
coliveira 10mo ago
Do you understand that Oracle has real features used daily by clients other than "securing" their communications?

by ishi 10mo ago

deleted 10mo ago

[deleted]

cluckindan 10mo ago

Are you sure such claims about Oracle are completely unfounded?

ishi 10mo ago
It's easy to make baseless accusations that are impossible to disprove, that's exactly my point.
- cluckindan 10mo ago
  Come on. The CIA was Oracle’s first customer.
kasey_junk 10mo ago
This framing is a cheap rhetorical trick. Restated this leads to the statement “all companies by default are in the business of capturing customer data, all other claims about their product and smoke screens to hide that.” Which is something you can believe but it falls into the extraordinary claims, extraordinary evidence category. But by claiming it about Oracle or Israeli cyber firms or whatever you swap the evidence burden to the person who has the not extraordinary claim, that most businesses are doing what it claims on the tin.
- chiefalchemist 10mo ago
  Books such as: “The Age of Surveillance Capitalism” and “Stand Out of Our Light” might not change your mind, but you’re likely to end up realizing customer data hovering is more of a driver of modern business decisions than you realize. To say nothing of the assets such activities provide the intelligence communities. This is happening. Please don’t dismiss it as conspiracy theory.
- coliveira 10mo ago
  It's not just a rhetorical trick. Amazon collects most of their data in Virginia, right at the doorsteps of a well known "intelligence" org in the USA. These companies that handle data all around the world are authorized to exist for some reason...
  - kasey_junk 10mo ago
    Then the argument should be that. Not “hey commenter you must prove a never ending set of ‘now do Oracle’, ‘now do Amazon’”. Say the words “I believe all companies exist as an extension of the US intelligence apparatus” and claim the burden for yourself.
    - cluckindan 10mo ago
      That is a strawman argument. Oracle gets its name from a codename of a 1977 project for the Central Intelligence Agency, Oracle's first customer. In 2004, then-United States Attorney General John Ashcroft sued Oracle Corporation to prevent it from acquiring a multibillion-dollar intelligence contract. After Ashcroft's resignation from government, he founded a lobbying firm, The Ashcroft Group, which Oracle hired in 2005. With the group's help, Oracle went on to acquire the contract. Following the beginning of the Gaza war in 2023, Oracle’s top executives, including Safra Catz and Larry Ellison, publicly aligned the company with Israel’s military operations. They issued statements of solidarity, paid double salaries to Israeli employees, and donated to organizations connected to Israel’s wartime response.
      - kasey_junk 10mo ago
        See. Thats a good comment. “Your use of Oracle is a bad counter factual because…” Switching to that is commenting in good faith. It educates and argues the point and makes it clear that you aren’t in fact claiming that all companies are surveillance state apparatus. Note that other commenters ran with the “but they are actually argument” because the door was opened.

Fnoord 10mo ago

> Is there any factual basis to this claim Please feel free to translate and read the Dutch version of this article. On the bottom, several security researchers found vulnerabilities in Zivver [1] [1] https://www.ftm.nl/artikelen/vertrouwelijke-zaken-te-grabbel-na-overname-zivver-door-kiteworks https://www.ftm.nl/artikelen/vertrouwelijke-zaken-te-grabbel...

ishi 10mo ago
So Zivver created a product with security vulnerabilities, Kitenet bought Zivver (probably for their customer base), and it's all some sort of conspiracy to steal personal data?
- chiefalchemist 10mo ago
  To be fair, it’s not a conspiracy if it actually happens. It’s surprising how often this type of reasoning is still so common.
  - dlubarov 10mo ago
    What are you saying actually happened? It sounds like the concern is that in a certain context, messages are cloud hosted instead of client-side e2e encrypted? Did anyone even claim otherwise? How is this different from suggesting Netflix was all a secret plot by Stanford to spy on Europeans' TV binging?
    - Fnoord 10mo ago
      Two anonymous security researchers working at Dutch government found the data is send plaintext [1]. One independent security researcher was able to verify their claim. This should be a concern if the company is owned by Dutch people, but more so if it is owned by a company with questionable jurisdiction. Which unfortunately the USA and Israel are these days. [1] https://www.ftm.nl/artikelen/vertrouwelijke-zaken-te-grabbel-na-overname-zivver-door-kiteworks https://www.ftm.nl/artikelen/vertrouwelijke-zaken-te-grabbel...

nunobrito 10mo ago

It is an obvious and recurring phenomenon to anyone minimally following cybersecurity topics. This isn't the first time, nor the second, nor the third, nor the last. This is the same as claiming that water isn't wet until someone here on HN brings you 10 articles and news proving otherwise. This particular topic was never really denied, nor even by the authors themselves as you can read on the article.

coliveira 10mo ago

Do you understand that Oracle has real features used daily by clients other than "securing" their communications?