2 ms·

Isn't that only to get somewhere else? My point is in the real world sharing an area with it would mean the other store also contributes tax wise. It's not eq

Isn't that only to get somewhere else? My point is in the real world sharing an area with it would mean the other store also contributes tax wise. It's not equivalent to bring up real life if the real life paying part isn't also adhered to; the lack of symmetry is notable. I don't think they deserve to set their price, though (30% is way too high).

stale2002 10mo ago
> would mean the other store also contributes tax wise. No, land parcel A does not pay land parcel B any amount of dollars at all. The fact that the government gets tax revenue says nothing about the fact that land parcel B receives nothing, even if they are require to open their street to the public for easement.