3 ms·
I like that family of fonts but ultimately couldn't live with how tall they are. I want to have 50-60 lines of code on my screen. With it I had 35-40.
by pdimitar 10mo ago
I like that family of fonts but ultimately couldn't live with how tall they are. I want to have 50-60 lines of code on my screen. With it I had 35-40.
- amelius 10mo agoFrom another point of view, the font is just as tall as other fonts, just less wide. So I suspect you are (maybe unconsciously) making an unfair comparison by scaling one font more than the other. You can see an apples-to-apples comparison here: https://www.programmingfonts.org/#iosevka https://www.programmingfonts.org/#iosevka (and then put and hold your finger on the last line of text and select another font)
- pdimitar 10mo agoYes, you are correct. When I shrunk it to have the same amount of lines as Ubuntu Mono, it was uncomfortably small. But you are inspiring me to give it another go. Thanks. They are beautiful fonts and are often updated, too. Clearly a lot care goes into their crafting.
- ashton314 10mo agoI hear you: I don't like how skinny the letterforms are. There's an "extended" variant that I find much more pleasing. I put together a customization you can see here: https://codeberg.org/ashton314/iosevka-output https://codeberg.org/ashton314/iosevka-output (there's a nice screenshot on that page). You can probably get the proportions you want if you find a way to tweak the line spacing (also possible by adjusting the `leading` option in `private-build-plans.toml` and rebuilding).
- pdimitar 10mo agoNice blend, thanks. Ubuntu Mono remains undefeated for now for me though.