4 ms·
> Graduate students aren't cited for coming up with innovations Nonsense. > the controversy is valid, No. You can see both publications right here [1]. Watso
by naasking 11mo ago
> Graduate students aren't cited for coming up with innovations
Nonsense.
> the controversy is valid,
No. You can see both publications right here [1]. Watson and Crick explicitly say they are aware of the "general nature" of Franklin's results, but they are the only ones in that issue to propose the double helix structure with the specific features that explained all of the evidence, published and unpublished.
[1] https://www.mskcc.org/teaser/1953-nature-papers-watson-crick-wilkins-franklin.pdf https://www.mskcc.org/teaser/1953-nature-papers-watson-crick...
- bonsai_spool 11mo ago> Nonsense Well, I don’t know what to say except that you are wrong. > No. You can see both publications right here I appreciate that you have found articles to support your argument and encourage you to continue reading further.
- tpoacher 10mo agowhy should they? there's clearly no other significant countering literature otherwise you would have offered it ... right?
- bonsai_spool 10mo agoIt sounds like you may also benefit from further reading about this issue.